Get Thee To A Nunnery
Debutant
Thinking....of a new way to rip off a Hawthorn game plan....oh wait....we tried that last time......hang on...what was that about asking Tivendale to come out of retirement.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BL v COL · NM v CAR · ADE v FRE · RIC v PA · WCE v SYD · MEL v GCS · WB v ESS · HAW v GEE ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
Soccer Notice Image
FA Cup Semi-Finals ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ Europa - Rd of 16 ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - KNOCKOUTS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ Champs League - League Phase ⚽
Thinking....of a new way to rip off a Hawthorn game plan....oh wait....we tried that last time......hang on...what was that about asking Tivendale to come out of retirement.....

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Preparing his Gold Coast Powerpoint presentation.
Umm thanks anyway but we want to start a "winning" tradition.
Preparing his Gold Coast Powerpoint presentation.
Umm thanks anyway but we want to start a "winning" tradition.

A poster I rate elsewhere wrote:
"The other issue is of course Richmond. They have the second oldest list in the competition. Their 6 oldest players have played 47% of the total games on the list and (Richardson, Brown, Johnson, Cousins, Bowden and Simmonds) will all be over 31 at the beginning of next year. But perhaps more staggeringly their next oldest player this year is 25 years old at 1st April. That's a 4 year gap. They have taken 6 players in the ND in the last two years, and one of those was an Essendon reject.
I reckon their list is in diabolical trouble and I think they are falling for the exact mistake Melbourne made. The difference is that at least we made finals when we were doing it. They haven't made finals since 2001."
Do you disagree ?
A poster I rate elsewhere wrote:
"The other issue is of course Richmond. They have the second oldest list in the competition. Their 6 oldest players have played 47% of the total games on the list and (Richardson, Brown, Johnson, Cousins, Bowden and Simmonds) will all be over 31 at the beginning of next year. But perhaps more staggeringly their next oldest player this year is 25 years old at 1st April. That's a 4 year gap. They have taken 6 players in the ND in the last two years, and one of those was an Essendon reject.
I reckon their list is in diabolical trouble and I think they are falling for the exact mistake Melbourne made. The difference is that at least we made finals when we were doing it. They haven't made finals since 2001."
Do you disagree ?
Obviously he meant 27, not 25, which would make it a 4 year gap indeed. No I don't disagree with any of that. Our list is up shit creek, I've said this for ages, but the ferals and brightsiders won't listen. The sad thing is with 2 new teams plundering the drafts, it could mean we are a decade away from having a premiership list if certain players do not come on as hoped.A poster I rate elsewhere wrote:
"The other issue is of course Richmond. They have the second oldest list in the competition. Their 6 oldest players have played 47% of the total games on the list and (Richardson, Brown, Johnson, Cousins, Bowden and Simmonds) will all be over 31 at the beginning of next year. But perhaps more staggeringly their next oldest player this year is 25 years old at 1st April. That's a 4 year gap. They have taken 6 players in the ND in the last two years, and one of those was an Essendon reject.
I reckon their list is in diabolical trouble and I think they are falling for the exact mistake Melbourne made. The difference is that at least we made finals when we were doing it. They haven't made finals since 2001."
Do you disagree ?
You're a little too quick to judge, perhaps 25 was a typo, as this 31 to 27 year age difference is the 4 year gap the poster was referring to. Therefore his comments retain all credibility - there are 4 years there, (say about 10 years ago) where Richmond haven't recruited well enough to retain players of these ages, and this is probably compounded by perhaps sub-par recruiting since 2003 or 2004 (5 years ago).No, but at least he could his facts straight. Shane Tuck is 27, Pettifer is 27, Moore is 26 by April, Coughlan is 27 by April. There goes all creditability, he has no idea.
To a point...but it fails to take into account the rookie & pre-season draft(not counting Cousins) and the prospects of players like Deledio -who still can and should become elite - and Cotchin and others who like Foley , Morton, Reiwoldt and Connors who if they step up are far better than any prospects on your list, bar Watts & Morton's brother.
That's not to say we don't have serious problems though.


