Isn't Michael Christian still the MRO? Or does Brad Scott do everything now?
Christian is MRO in name only. Every decision he makes is either approved or altered by Brad Scott. So effectively Brad Scott makes all MRO decisions.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Isn't Michael Christian still the MRO? Or does Brad Scott do everything now?
It's 2022 mate, not 1972, when they only had one umpire and one camera. The days of square ups are over, won't happen.Geelong fans should be fighting for the Red card rule.
You reckon next time around the Tigers won't be up and about ? Geelong choosing to play this card in Round 15 is bewildering. I would have done this in the finals, great move for a finals match, great intensity, but Round 15?
If tigers and cats meet in the finals, there's no way the Tigers aren't sending some of those 35 year olds to their rightly place in the retirement home
You gonna go to Tom's house and give him the old left-right-goodnight are ya?Geelong fans should be fighting for the Red card rule.
You reckon next time around the Tigers won't be up and about ? Geelong choosing to play this card in Round 15 is bewildering. I would have done this in the finals, great move for a finals match, great intensity, but Round 15?
If tigers and cats meet in the finals, there's no way the Tigers aren't sending some of those 35 year olds to their rightly place in the retirement home
Would explain why we have screwed so badly this year.Christian is MRO in name only. Every decision he makes is either approved or altered by Brad Scott. So effectively Brad Scott makes all MRO decisions.
Severe is bonkers
I've seen much more force applied in similar situations
It was explained to me once that its how deliberately running a red light and having a car accident is not intentionally causing an accident.
It used to be called "driving without due care" (ie careless) or more seriously "dangerous driving".
In this case, they'd argue that Stewart did not intentionally look to hit Prestia in the head.
Bullsh1t isn't it?
4, easily. 5/6 would not be too much either. Nasty nasty nasty and not wanted in our game
All the best to Prestia.
View attachment 1432601
View attachment 1432602
View attachment 1432611
He was messed up bad
1/ Good. I hope both you lot snot each other silly at the pointy end. It's two less clubs to worry aboutGeelong fans should be fighting for the Red card rule.
You reckon next time around the Tigers won't be up and about ? Geelong choosing to play this card in Round 15 is bewildering. I would have done this in the finals, great move for a finals match, great intensity, but Round 15?
If tigers and cats meet in the finals, there's no way the Tigers aren't sending some of those 35 year olds to their rightly place in the retirement home
He intentionally bumped.He chose to bump, but did Stewart intentionally try to hurt Prestia? It's going to be difficult to prove it to be intentional...
TomorrowDoes he face the tribunal tonight or Tuesday?
yeh, maybe on fieldWas Gaff on Brayshaw the last 4 plus weeker suspension?
Agree and this is what shits me about the AFL, a tackle even if poorly executed is at least a defensive play at the ball, either to win the ball back, or force an error or halve the contest for your team. You are only making that action because the player you are tackling has the ball as your focus.If Lycette got four for that then Stewart has to get four as a minimum.
Yep I think that’s spot on4-5 weeks. Three clearly not enough. Six too many.
Haha he actually takes 2 steps. Don't act like contact was accidental. It was intentional 100%. Chooses to bump, gets him high. Didn't even try go low, extremely careless. Should get 4weeks. Simple as that.A lot of 'late hit' comments.
Prestia punches the ball away while Stewart is on his right foot.
Takes one step, travelling at speed, before impact. Cops Prestia while on his left foot. Literally one step later. We've all seen the slow motion replay, but in real time it wasn't even a split second between ball being knocked away and point of impact.
Huge hit, will miss weeks, but it's a long way from 'ran past the ball to line him up.'
Certainly got nothing on Alex Rance punching a prone Jack Watts in the back of the head or Bachar Houli (best on in the the 2017 grand final) taking Jed Lamb's head off.
There's big hits in football, and then there's dog shots. Let's not confuse the two.
Probably the most rational, truest thing posted on this thread.High puts it at 2 weeks. There is no way the AFL were going to allow him to get away with 2 for that.
The AFL would be working out the penalty and trying to fit the gradings to that. Intentional could be argued down at the tribunal to careless, much harder to argue that it wasn't severe.
Some people got a crush on old Brad.Isn't Michael Christian still the MRO? Or does Brad Scott do everything now?
It would have happened during the game at least. There was not one remonstration, at any time. Supporters shouldn't project their feelings on the players.It's 2022 mate, not 1972, when they only had one umpire and one camera. The days of square ups are over, won't happen.
Haha he actually takes 2 steps. Don't act like contact was accidental. It was intentional 100%. Chooses to bump, gets him high. Didn't even try go low, extremely careless. Should get 4weeks. Simple as that.
View attachment 1434136
Yes he intentionally bumped Prestia. A bump is a legal action. Due to the careless nature in which he executed that intentional bump, he got Prestia high with a severe impact.He intentionally bumped.
He admitted that.
No one in the history of intentional gradings would ever say they intended to hurt their opponent....