We're talking about Lethal and Dustin here, no need to insert Dangerfield into the conversation, remember only one player can be compared to Lethal without Lethal feeling insulted, and Lethal has told all of us who that player is, and it's not Dangerfield, so please, let's not insult Lethal by inserting Patrick into the conversation. I can accept that most will say that Lethal was better than Dustin, and looking at Lethal's record I wouldn't even bother arguing, but what everyone has to accept is that Dustin was the Lethal of these times, not Dangerfield.
It has to be said that many in the football industry didn't interpret what Lethal said the way you have (that he was referring to accolades), that's why those that disagreed with what Lethal said brought up Lethal's stats from the 1977 seaon, which they wouldn't of did if Lethal was referring to accolades. I didn't need Lethal to tell me that Dustin was the most decorated player in a single season that the game has ever seen, did you?
So Lloyd said something you agree with, Lethal has also said something about Dustin, do you agree with Lethal?
Yes no need to literally insert pieces from the comment he made.
Yes it’s amazing how un-open for interpretation it is when a key forward says ‘he played on me’ compared to ‘no one has had a season like that.’
If it had nothing to do with how decorated he was, why would Matthews start bringing up vote tallies etc etc?
It can’t be that difficult to separate the concepts of achievement vs quality.
Let me guess.
If Player A produces a game for his team that reaps 9 goals, 2 goal assists and a couple of tackles, and gets 2 Brownlow votes, because someone else in the game had 10 goals, 2 goal assists and a couple of tackles, you would say that Player A has been inferior to Player B, who in a different game has 4 goals, the most on the field, and picks up 3 Brownlow votes