Remove this Banner Ad

travis cloke vs kepler bradley

  • Thread starter Thread starter pie time
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

travis cloke vs kepler bradley

  • cloke

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • bradley

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

tell me why he isnt? cloke has won a b&f when the side was a kick out of a grand final.
has kicked 40 goals twice in his career and is only 22.
now please tell me what bradley has acheived?

He has achieved a wonderful owning of you in this thread.
And that is all that matters.
 
yep that would be right? couldnt come up with something intellegent to say so you could'nt come up with a descent arguement about bradley on the footy field
 
yep that would be right? couldnt come up with something intellegent to say so you could'nt come up with a descent arguement about bradley on the footy field

travis cloke has hit a brick wall, like his older brothers its all downhill from here.

kepler was mistreated at essendon after showing heaps of promise as a junior, and his career is only just beginning and he is a better player.
 
Alot of people on BigFooty must be idiots. I expected not much short of 100% for Cloke and I find him 28-65 behind. while his 2009 wasn't his best his performance, especially playing in the hardest position on the ground, is so much better than Bradley's.

What idiot could possibly think otherwise. No wonder people bag the intelligence of BigFooty posters.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

yep that would be right? couldnt come up with something intellegent to say so you could'nt come up with a descent arguement about bradley on the footy field
I believe that the onus is on you to prove who is the better player. It is, after all, your poll.
You have stated your, abeit thin and strawman-esque, case and the people have spoken.
Try digging up for a change.
 
i have backed up what ive said with a stat the bradley has not come close to acheiving at either side he has been at. and at essendon he was no good plain and simple
 
yeah only because cloke is a collingwood player if he was a freo player and bradley was a magpie it would be the opposite
 
i have backed up what ive said with a stat the bradley has not come close to acheiving at either side he has been at. and at essendon he was no good plain and simple

And yet the poll currently stands at 66-28.
So, either your argument is crap. Or, you are comparing apples with oranges.
Kep has never played as a KP forward for any period of time..ever. So how are goal kicking stats relevant?
As for Clokes B+F? Well I can't help it if he was giving the coaching staff some under the table action.
There can be no other reason for him winning it.
 
I think the poll result is fairly accurate. You have embarassed yourself with this thread.

Let's correct that by saying "BigFooty accurate". Anyone in their right mind would think otherwise.

It's like Carlton and Collingwood with these type of comparison threads. People speak out their ass with agendas. No brains involved. So how would one know if it was an accurate reflection. If there was a poll comparing Fev (Carlton days) and Bradley most would've said Bradley I'm sure. Right now though that would be Fev by miles and miles given he's with Brisbane. Get my point???
 
how am i embarrasing myself im the one giving proven stats about a player while use keep giving nothing?.
 
how am i embarrasing myself im the one giving proven stats about a player while use keep giving nothing?.

Stats mean nothing, clearly the majority understands Kepler Bradley is a once in a generation player.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

yep as i said what has bradley acctually done in his career besides get axed?.
 
yep as i said what has bradley acctually done in his career besides get axed?.

Well there is a player named Chris Judd. Perhaps you have heard of him. Well Keps sidestepped him like he was nothing on his way to a wonderful goal. This does not show up in your BS "stats". Cloke can not do things like this.
 
Alot of people on BigFooty must be idiots. I expected not much short of 100% for Cloke and I find him 28-65 behind. while his 2009 wasn't his best his performance, especially playing in the hardest position on the ground, is so much better than Bradley's.

What idiot could possibly think otherwise. No wonder people bag the intelligence of BigFooty posters.

This is kind of ironic, given that you are calling everyone in this thread who voted for Bradley a moron despite the fact that it is plainly obvious that they aren't being totally genuine in their assessments.
 
umm its one thing?
cloke has done several things and kicking a goal isnt much to hang your hat on?
when he kicks 40 goals twice in 2 seasons please come say.
 
For about the 100th time. When KB plays as a KP forward we will give you a call and then you can devastate us all with your grip on statistics.
You really have no clue.
 
you act as if bradley has not player there? if he was any good he would stay there.
its like tarrant he use to be good there but isnt now so he is elsewhere.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

you act as if bradley has not player there? if he was any good he would stay there.
its like tarrant he use to be good there but isnt now so he is elsewhere.

its like cloke use to be good there but isnt now so he is still there...

Wait wat.
 
tarrant use to play in the forwardline is now a defender? that better or dont use understand everyday english?
 
tarrant use to play in the forwardline is now a defender? that better or dont use understand everyday english?

:confused::rolleyes:
nbfcrp.jpg
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom