Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Publicity stunt, you need to go deeper.
You served those products for most of you life.
You served those products for most of you life.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Sitting at around a 30% lecture attendance rate for this semester. feelslazyman
Do any of you look at your University's stalker page?
Damn you for owned my ass.![]()
We like to fancy ourselves as being a great nation of egalitarians. Yet when you look closely, we do not always pass the test. Nobody sensible believes that equality of opportunity should mean equality of outcome. But we do like to think that we treat people equally. That we are ''fair''.
Despite our self-image as a fair and egalitarian country, we nonetheless happily treat school-leavers who go to university much more generously than we do all the other school-leavers. This generous treatment only panders to and enhances the snobbish, middle-class, inflated sense of being better that so many tertiary-educated people seem to display.
We all enjoy the benefits of a well-educated society, which is why we should keep seeking to raise the standard. But let's not forget that those who benefit the most are those that get the better education. University graduates generally get better jobs, have higher incomes, enjoy better health and spend less time in jail.
This is neither a small nor a passing benefit. Yes, there is a great public benefit in higher education - but there is a great personal one as well.
Sadly, the opportunity is not spread as evenly as many would hope. To try to spread the opportunity, we have a wonderful system that allows you to get a tertiary education and to pay later . . . much later. The factors, other than the cost, that determine whether someone goes to university come into play much earlier in life, and they are not easy to even out. So the remaining two-thirds of school-leavers just have to make the best of their lot.
It's a sorry state of affairs when any secondary school student, in response to the question, ''What do you want to do when you leave school?'' starts the answer with a mumbled, ''Well, I won't go to university.'' In such a lucky, wealthy country, how did we end up with young Australians thinking they are somehow lesser because they are not going to university? How did we end up with any young Australians defining themselves in the first instance by a negative?
In a society that all too often admires wealth over and above many admirable qualities, what else did we expect? If you value wealth over skill or decency or any number of other virtuous qualities, you must expect that those who get the ticket that sends them down the wealthier path, namely a degree, feel as though they are pretty special.
Thirty-something years ago, on my first overseas trip, an old man who made his living giving tourists horse-drawn buggy rides around Rome taught me a good lesson. My hotel, to suit my budget, was outside the walls. He was resting nearby and I flashed my student card to get a decent discount. Amazed and indignant, he refused. He had seen me come out from a reasonable, but certainly not flash, hotel and decided I did not need any discount.
I was annoyed and moved on to get a ride somewhere else. But I did not seek the discount a second time. That old guy, probably without much opportunity in his earlier life, stood up for the principle that if you do not need help, you should not get it.
More recently, Rome provided another lesson. I met a Filipina woman who had worked overseas for nine or more years. She sent every penny she could back home to her husband to help raise and educate their three boys. Her family could not give her an education and she will always be grateful to the Catholic nuns who provided her with schooling. She has made sure her boys get the very best she can. You would be lucky to find a more decent, hardworking, honest and principled person. She had the added bonus of commonsense, which is, after all, not that common.
At the same time, I have worked over many years with many people who did have a tertiary education, some of whom had picked up few, if any, of the abovementioned qualities.
Science and research generally offer hope for the future. Without them we are doomed. But people with degrees are not in themselves more valuable. Without the qualities of my Filipina friend, they are just expensive pains in the neck.
I have no quibble with the investment we make in higher education or in students. I just think that, to be fair, they should have to start paying it back sooner.
The full adult pension, including supplement, is about $19,000 a year. The minimum wage is just under $30,000. So why do we say to students, who get a massive loan at no real interest rate, that they do not have to pay back a cent until they are earning just under $45,000?
http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/so...long-with-their-hecs-debt-20110320-1c24r.html
Thoughts?
I think its incoherent dribble, which is trying to be smart but ultimately fails in her delivery. According to a quick wikipedia edit, she's dishonest, lazy and has no principles as she hasn't paid back any of her free education she received at the University of Adelaide back in the prehistoric ages. Go back in your hole Amanda.
You mean 'drivel'.

You mean 'drivel'.
You served those products for most of you life.
I think that was Rojo, not ben
It's RoJo's private life too
You're in for a shock....I'll make more money than any of you in this thread. Chemical Engineer bitches.



You're in for a shock....
