Justcruzin
Rookie
Given the disappointing results of James Hird and Nathan Buckley this year, relative to expectations that is, I wondered today how long they could go without improving. Hird has had an extra year thus far, but if both continued to disappoint, who do you think would be sacked first?
Serious replies only please.
I can't understand why you think Buckley had a disappointing year, with the injuries Collingwood had, the Cloke saga, J Mac, and all the other crap he had to put up with in his first year, making the prelim was a bloody good effort and I really couldn't see Malthouse doing much better. You have to remember the Pies were not looking that flash at the end of last year either. How about we leave the judgments to the end of next year at least.





