- Aug 1, 2008
- 15,149
- 25,675
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Banned
- #12,801
The abstract only warns of the potential of a natural occurrence - it does not conjecture about any human manipulation. Rather, it warns of the dangers of encroaching into bat's natural habitat from deforestation and the subsequent increased risks associated with inevitable closer interaction of bats with urban environments.You're welcome.
IMO, I think it's highly probable that some would have run computer modelling and came to that conclusion.
Molecular geneticists are very credible and disciplined scientists and I would be surprised if any engaged in ridiculous practices such as economic forecasting.
I'm sure if you looked at enough scientific papers you will find something that fits with most events, in hindsight. It's no mistake that there's a computer modeller among these researchers.
Do you have data to back this up?
I have no reason to believe that China has inferior scientists.
Ahhhh, finally I arrive at the punchline. I think it is highly unlikely that the Wuhan S mutation arose from a laboratory. There are solid evolutionary genomics models that strongly suggest it arose via natural evolutionary mechanisms.
Now, please allow me to ask you a question in return?
Did the authors of the paper that you utilise as a reference speculate that something similar to Covid19 would arise from human genetic manipulation and/or natural selection?
As for your other question, the abstract from 2019, details the intensity of global research into bat viruses where it highlights the Chinese domination in this field.