News Dons ASADA scandal (Latest: Pg 101 - CAS verdict. Guilty, 12 months.)

Remove this Banner Ad

As it's the off season, perhaps a football quiz will help pass the day.

Free offsite injections of something from Mexico to the first person to get it correct.

In the history of AFL/VFL who is the only person to be found guilty of bringing the game into disrepute as both a player & a coach????
 
letstayunited said:
Yes of course I considered that, but when you are having to subpoena YOUR OWN WITNESSES, I think you're in a bit of strife.

It's game over haters:)
Click to expand...

This is complete rubbish.

Just because a person knows something does not mean he or she will automatically volunteer that information or their time. Subpoenas are routinely used even for cooperative witnesses. If a person's case relies on evidence from a particular witness and the lawyer fails to issue a subpoena because he or she relies on a promise to attend by that witness, how would the lawyer demonstrate that he or she did everything to ensure the witness's presence when the witness does not actually turn up? How could he or she defeat a negligence case brought by his or her own client? In my view, if a witness is required you issue a subpoena (they are easy to prepare), regardless of how helpful the witness has been. It helps the witness too. A subpoena is a pretty good excuse to miss work on any given day. Without a subpoena there is no compulsion to attend and an employer can legitimately refuse leave.

You clearly have no knowledge of process and are sprouting rubbish to serve your agenda. You remind me of Jacqui Lambie.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Obese Arachnid said:
As it's the off season, perhaps a football quiz will help pass the day.

Free offsite injections of something from Mexico to the first person to get it correct.

In the history of AFL/VFL who is the only person to be found guilty of bringing the game into disrepute as both a player & a coach????
Click to expand...
MM
 
Last edited:
Eddies scoop on ASADA offering Charters a job was truly pathetic. He sure is sympathetic for a mob who claimed we are drug cheats. He is hopelessly biased due to his link with Evans. First time I've been disappointed with the great man.
 
Lockyer24 said:
Eddies scoop on ASADA offering Charters a job was truly pathetic. He sure is sympathetic for a mob who claimed we are drug cheats. He is hopelessly biased due to his link with Evans. First time I've been disappointed with the great man.
Click to expand...
Yep, there is plenty of people at the top end of the game that have forgotten what is at the core of this. Drug cheating, which is the next rung down from match fixing for me.

I think fatigue has played a part in this, so many people just want it over. I still want it done right
 
speedytiger said:
I think fatigue has played a part in this, so many people just want it over. I still want it done right
Click to expand...

both.png
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

ASADA's application to subpeona Charter and Alavi rejected by the Supreme Court:



Cue the truthers...
 
Charter's evidence to ASADA was taped.
This decision will not stop that tape from being played to the Tribunal

What it will prevent is Charter being questioned further (by both ASADA and Essendon) at the Tribunal about what he did say on tape
 
Baltimore Jack said:
Charter's evidence to ASADA was taped.
This decision will not stop that tape from being played to the Tribunal

What it will prevent is Charter being questioned further (by both ASADA and Essendon) at the Tribunal about what he did say on tape
Click to expand...
I assume there is also documentary evidence that will be produced, regardless of the two witnesses being there or not
 
Baltimore Jack said:
Charter's evidence to ASADA was taped.
This decision will not stop that tape from being played to the Tribunal

What it will prevent is Charter being questioned further (by both ASADA and Essendon) at the Tribunal about what he did say on tape
Click to expand...
Apparently he also did a radio interview where he said that they ordered TB4 that will be used as evidence too.
 
I don't see how any team which did the following can get off:

- Performed off site injection of substances
- Did not keep, or destroyed, the documentation of these substances
- Employed known and soon to be convicted criminals to source these substances
- Have provided no actual evidence of what they injected into their players

How the * can they even pretend like they are a clean club? The league is a farce if they aren't convicted. I don't give a s**t about punishment, but it has to be acknowledged that they're guilty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PonsfordMagpie
Toast Round 24 = Essendon 31-101 Collingwood
4 5 6 7 8
Replies
191
Views
7K
Swooper18
Swooper18
PonsfordMagpie
Toast Round 22 = Collingwood 109-101 Geelong
23 24 25 26 27
Replies
674
Views
20K
Mollythedolly
Mollythedolly
Jen2310
VFL VFL RD 12 v Casey. Sunday June 11 1:05 @ Casey
6 7 8 9 10
Replies
240
Views
7K
Jen2310
Jen2310
Jen2310
VFL VFL Round 2 v Brisbane, Friday March 29 12:05pm @ Brighton Homes Arena.
14 15 16 17 18
Replies
425
Views
10K
Maggie5
Maggie5
PonsfordMagpie
Toast Round 12 = West Coast 57-120 Collingwood
12 13 14 15 16
Replies
379
Views
11K
Fat Jesus
Fat Jesus
PonsfordMagpie
Toast Round 6 = Collingwood 123-81 Port Adelaide
10 11 12 13 14
Replies
348
Views
11K
gouki88
gouki88
Jen2310
VFL VFL Round 21 v Geelong - Saturday August 12 @ Victoria Park
4 5 6 7 8
Replies
185
Views
7K
Jen2310
Jen2310

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top