Fantasy Dynasty League 2008 - Discussion

[dspeed]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

I think 4 to 3 is a fair compromise.

I would vote YES to that.

either way we have to work out what we would be voting on

gg now wants it to be inside ESPN, so would it be 2 OP and 1 RB/WR. Still able to start extra TEs if you want

 

[Cassius_Clay]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

I think 4 to 3 is a fair compromise.

I would vote YES to that.

Yeah, fair enough IMO.

 

[exe ex machina]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

If 4 to 3 is a fair compromize it would mean the OP spot gets reduced from 3 to 2. As the max starting QB would be 3, it would in the ESPN system, and so people cant start more than that. It would mean there are 33 rounds now not 34. Unless I add an extra WR starting spot as well.

 

[exe ex machina]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

So ... ??

1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE.....2 OP, 1 what? RB/WR or WR/TE?

 

[dspeed]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

If 4 to 3 is a fair compromize it would mean the OP spot gets reduced from 3 to 2. As the max starting QB would be 3, it would in the ESPN system, and so people cant start more than that. It would mean there are 33 rounds now not 34. Unless I add an extra WR starting spot as well.

make it QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, TE, OP, OP, RB/WR

 

[exe ex machina]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

^ OK, so with that, i'd vote yes.

 

[Delroy]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

require minimum 75%, just like how a change to the constitution requires more than a simple majority

it just says a majority of the electors in a majority of the states.

 

[Cassius_Clay]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

make it QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, TE, OP, OP, RB/WR

Thats fair enough

 

[manureid]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

make it QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, TE, OP, OP, RB/WR

+1

 

[exe ex machina]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

Do we have a majority yet? Once we do, I'll announce it in the other MK's

 

[dspeed]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

In light of this recent debate, thought id redo that exercise i did about a week back to see how some teams matchup, will do it with all positions except K and one DL (as JD doesnt have a second one yet)

JD

Tom Brady 26
Reggie Bush 15
Willie Parker 12
Bernard Berrian 13
Donte Stallworth 12
Tony Gonzalez 13
Drew Brees 22
Derek Anderson 20
Matt Hasselbeck 20
Shawne Merriman 7
Jonathan Vilma 8
Patrick Kerney 6
Antonio Cromartie 6
Darren Sharper 6
Angelo Crowell 7

TOTAL 193

Dspeed

Jay Cutler 19
Steven Jackson 21
Julius Jones 8
Reggie Wayne 19
Marques Colston 16
Tony Scheffler 11
Terrell Owens 19
Jake Delhomme 14
Jon Kitna 14
Patrick Willis 12
David Harris 10
Jason Taylor 6
Thomas Davis 7
Nate Clements 7
Brian Urlacher 10

TOTAL 193

Dead on even, less one DL and K, makes a fairly good point.

 

[manureid]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

I think so far it is only:

YES (change)
gg
manu
dspeed
cass

NO (leave)

 

[dspeed]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

it just says a majority of the electors in a majority of the states.

yeh, your point? which when translated to this situation would mean at least 3 of 4 in each division, which equates to 9 out of 12 effectively

 

[Mordikai]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

DAMNIT there goes my strategy of drafting 4 kickers really late!!!

Im down

 

[manureid]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

^ that is okay dspeed, but in principal I think the idea of starting 4 QB's is not good. But that is just my opinion, and either way it does not matter to me as far as continuing to play in this league. 3 is a reasonable enough compromise, which does not destroy JD's entire draft, which is what I would not like to see happen.

And, has anyone seen Woody?????

 

[Delroy]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

yeh, your point? which when translated to this situation would mean at least 3 of 4 in each division, which equates to 9 out of 12 effectively

I just assumed a majority would be 7 following from that wording.

 

[manureid]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

Update

I think so far it is only:

YES (change)
gg
manu
dspeed
cass
Mord

NO (leave)

 

[dspeed]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

Do we have a majority yet? Once we do, I'll announce it in the other MK's

What is ruling on majority, up to gg

simple 7 of 12, or

9 of 12, or

majority of voters and a majority of divisions (3 of 4 in each division)

 

[exe ex machina]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

3/4 from a division sounds ok

 

[exe ex machina]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

it's likely 7/12 say YES from where the vote is now.
it's likely 3/4 division would from where the vote is now.

either way wont change the result

 

[dspeed]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

3/4 from a division sounds ok

ok, so youd assume the central has passed it, me and mord plus Woody who started this whole thing

east has cass and gg already saying yes

west only has 1 yes so far

 

[Wizard]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

I vote............ I DONT CARE!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Cassius_Clay]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

Its going to be accepted. Lets be honest.

JD is the main one this effects badly as he probably has to sell a QB.

 

[Wizard]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

dspeed, wanna rank my team when you get a moment mate??????

 

[Dagless]

Re: BFDL 1 Discussion Thread

make it QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, TE, OP, OP, RB/WR

I'm happy, as long as it DOESN'T force more than 1 starting QB (Obviously see where i'm coming from )