Play Nice Tippett Nominates Sydney - Part II

[Elite Crow]

Be cool if we use 22 on a kid and get Tippett later in the national draft. Ideal scenario

I think it's pretty clear with GWS number of picks that you won't be getting him. Good ol Sheedy

 

[The King!]

Agree, but someone like Paton is going to need a massive overs no return to Melbourne contract at the end of next year.

They were never interested in Cloke, which would indicate a fat wallet KPF is not n their radar.

DST

GWS would take any big fish surely

 

[The King!]

I think it's pretty clear with GWS number of picks that you won't be getting him. Good ol Sheedy

Who knows, as i said be interesting if they are willing to pass up the top kids in the draft.

 

[Elite Crow]

Agree, but someone like Paton is going to need a massive overs no return to Melbourne contract at the end of next year.

They were never interested in Cloke, which would indicate a fat wallet KPF is not n their radar.

DST

So instead of back loading Tippets contract, GWS front load it. Kurt gets his money a little bit earlier.

 

[Elite Crow]

Who knows, as i said be interesting if they are willing to pass up the top kids in the draft.

They've just said it, did you see the article on the Herald Sun?

 

[Danair]

Wow Adelaide supporters really are grasping for anything

GWS didn't want to pay Giles 300k a season, good luck finding a million for Tippett with a bunch of young players (Patton, Tyson, Hoskin-Elliot) still to re-sign.

 

[DST]

GWS would take any big fish surely

Doesn't really work that way, if you are going to commit $800,000 a year of your TPP to a player you need to be sure that you have a gap in your list and a need for that player.

What happens next year if a Judd came up and you had a hole in the middle on your list? Compromises your ability to trade for what you want or need in the future.

DST

 

[The King!]

They've just said it, did you see the article on the Herald Sun?

Yeah i did about trading picks, whats thats gotta do with drafting though, and the right price, doesnt mean anyhthing certain

 

[The King!]

Be nice if crows fans just waited for the deal, every article, comment, dumb source and they go up and down and up and down

 

[Elite Crow]

Yeah i did about trading picks, whats thats gotta do with drafting though, and the right price, doesnt mean anyhthing certain

Hmmm, assuming they don't get the trades done and they've still got the picks, what do you think they will do with them? Pick kids and let the biggest fish of the trade period swim to you guys?

 

[DST]

Don't think GWS would do this, but what about the following:

White, TDL and pick 22 to GWS
Pick 13 to Adelaide
Tippett to Sydney

Would Adelaide supporters take pick 13?

DST

 

[Elite Crow]

Be nice if crows fans just waited for the deal, every article, comment, dumb source and they go up and down and up and down

If I counted all your posts on this topic, how many would there be? 100?

 

[Elite Crow]

Don't think GWS would do this, but what about the following:

White, TDL and pick 22 to GWS
Pick 13 to Adelaide
Tippett to Sydney

Would Adelaide supporters take pick 13?

DST

Not when theres pick 2 on offer

 

[DST]

Hmmm, assuming they don't get the trades done and they've still got the picks, what do you think they will do with them? Pick kids and let the biggest fish of the trade period swim to you guys?

I think so, the price and type of player is just not what they are looking for or need at present.

If Tippett was a KPD or first ruck then that is a no brainer for them.

DSR

 

[The King!]

Hmmm, assuming they don't get the trades done and they've still got the picks, what do you think they will do with them? Pick kids and let the biggest fish of the trade period swim to you guys?

Well depends how good the kids are and salary cap space, do they want tippett when he doesnt want to be there, 5 quality kids your passing up

I presume you know the answer of course

 

[DST]

Not when theres pick 2 on offer

It's possible, but I reckon Sydney and GWS have been in some deep discussions about using Giles as part of the deal so the Swans would have a fair idea what GWS's thoughts are on Tippett.

DST

 

[Elite Crow]

It's possible, but I reckon Sydney and GWS have been in some deep discussions about using Giles as part of the deal so the Swans would have a fair idea what GWS's thoughts are on Tippett.

DST

You reckon? I reckon you reckon wrong

 

[Elite Crow]

Well depends how good the kids are and salary cap space, do they want tippett when he doesnt want to be there, 5 quality kids your passing up

I presume you know the answer of course

I presume you do too By the way, what was the answer, 100?

 

[NTRabbit]

It's possible, but I reckon Sydney and GWS have been in some deep discussions about using Giles as part of the deal so the Swans would have a fair idea what GWS's thoughts are on Tippett.

DST

Adelaide and GWS negotiated independently for Giles, and in the end he signed an extension with the GWS, with two conflicting stories as to who knocked whom back, and why.

 

[The King!]

I presume you do too By the way, what was the answer, 100?

Nah thats why i said i wonder what they will do if he is in the national draft seeking 4 years for close to 4 mill, i dont know at all.

I just want it done one way or the other then we can work on trades with clubs that dont stuff around

 

[Elite Crow]

Nah thats why i said i wonder what they will do if he is in the national draft seeking 4 years for close to 4 mill, i dont know at all.

I just want it done one way or the other then we can work on trades with clubs that dont stuff around

So we are stuffing around by not taking 22 for Tippett? Fair dinkum, everyone knows that's unders.

But I agree can't wait for it to be over, by the way I reckon you are now up to post 103

 

[DST]

You reckon? I reckon you reckon wrong

That's the $64 million question, but I would put money on the Swans having a fair idea at present on what GWS's position is on drafting Tippett with pick 13.

All the available evidence suggests its unlikely.

DST

 

[Elite Crow]

That's the $64 million question, but I would put money on the Swans having a fair idea at present on what GWS's position is on drafting Tippett with pick 13.

All the available evidence suggests its unlikely.

DST

What available evidence?

 

[The King!]

So we are stuffing around by not taking 22 for Tippett? Fair dinkum, everyone knows that's unders.

But I agree can't wait for it to be over, by the way I reckon you are now up to post 103

Wicked i might catch button92 for crap contributed soon then ill have you in my sights

 

[DST]

What available evidence?

They have two young quality KPF's already
They have just resigned their ruckman
They were never interested in Cloke
The only other two suitors in GC and Brisbane are out
They could just use pick 13 in the ND rather than trade pick 2 as the Swans are the only other suitor

Collectively the evidence suggests that GWS are not interested, but if they were pick 13 would only need to be used fom their end.

DST