Remove this Banner Ad

No Oppo Supporters Re-signing Tex, Danger and Sloane *** Crows Only ***

  • Thread starter Thread starter Allefgib
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Your thoughts on Dangerfield?


  • Total voters
    684

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
our midfield had no inclination to protect ANYONE - it's a hangover from the Craig "perceived pressure" era and as you correctly pointed out it was not stamped out by Sando.
How come when I wrote that at the end of last year it was howled down as bullshit..?


Rhetorical.
Not expecting you to answer as it wasn't you. ;)



Lol
 
In Walsh we trust...

I think it should be - In Roo we trust

"We'll get the contract right, we'll pay [Dangerfield] what he needs to be paid, but we've got to get the culture, environment and everything right so that he can win a premiership, because he wants to win one," Ricciuto said.


"In regards to his contract with the Crows, Dangerfield stressed he wanted to stay with the Crows when his current deal expires at the end of next season.
'I love the city, I love the club, I love playing there. And that's all that needs to be said.' "
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Whilst I think Douglas was great in 2011 (?) and 2013, I can't help but think his disappointing season this year being blamed on the groin injury early on is a bit of a cop out. Like no doubt it would have slowed him down early on but he was average for the majority of the season and the injury would have well and truly healed by then. He also trained for the majority of the pre season, getting in a pre season game where he received his painful injury. He was back in the side come round 2 so it's not as if he missed a major amount of time on the sidelines.

Like everyone, I hope he bounces back this year, I just think people are too quick to blame his average season on an injury rather then the player/system.
 
Justin Reid has said we won't sell the farm for one player so assuming Danger gets an over the top contract we won't match it.
 
Whilst I think Douglas was great in 2011 (?) and 2013, I can't help but think his disappointing season this year being blamed on the groin injury early on is a bit of a cop out. Like no doubt it would have slowed him down early on but he was average for the majority of the season and the injury would have well and truly healed by then. He also trained for the majority of the pre season, getting in a pre season game where he received his painful injury. He was back in the side come round 2 so it's not as if he missed a major amount of time on the sidelines.

Like everyone, I hope he bounces back this year, I just think people are too quick to blame his average season on an injury rather then the player/system.
Your a tough marker..

Do you know the full extent of the "injury"???

Do you know exactly how long he had to wear the cricket/martial arts box for during the season??

Do you know for sure that having to wear it didn't impact his form??

Whilst the site of the injury may have healed do you know the full effect of it on the players psyche???

Healed in body maybe, but mind??

Let's not kid ourselves this was a very serious injury putting his future parentage aspirations at risk and requiring urgent surgery.
 
It also makes it more a question of wether he should have been traded last year. When people crap on about how it wasnt such a risk not to trade him because we could match the offer or send him to the draft they just have their hand on it.

You can't trade a player who doesn't want to be traded, and trying to force a player who is in the leadership group and well liked by the playing group, into a trade, is poison for club culture.
 
Whilst I think Douglas was great in 2011 (?) and 2013, I can't help but think his disappointing season this year being blamed on the groin injury early on is a bit of a cop out. Like no doubt it would have slowed him down early on but he was average for the majority of the season and the injury would have well and truly healed by then. He also trained for the majority of the pre season, getting in a pre season game where he received his painful injury. He was back in the side come round 2 so it's not as if he missed a major amount of time on the sidelines.

Like everyone, I hope he bounces back this year, I just think people are too quick to blame his average season on an injury rather then the player/system.


The guys testical was split open, he played out the season having to wear a cricket box, which would have been uncomfortable on top of the fact he was recovering from having his testical split open from an impact with a knee. I'd rather break a leg than go through what dougie went through.
 
Your a tough marker..

Do you know the full extent of the "injury"???

Do you know exactly how long he had to wear the cricket/martial arts box for during the season??

Do you know for sure that having to wear it didn't impact his form??

Whilst the site of the injury may have healed do you know the full effect of it on the players psyche???

Healed in body maybe, but mind??

Let's not kid ourselves this was a very serious injury putting his future parentage aspirations at risk and requiring urgent surgery.
I could ask those exact same questions the other way around and you'd know as many of those answers as I would.

What I do know is he was playing footy from round 2 onwards, no doubt you'd expect him to start a little slow as it did seem like he was 'rushed' back but after a couple of months I'd assume that would be well and truly healed (or he wouldn't have played to begin with) yet his form didn't really change as the season went on.

I'm not going to discount it may have played some part in his disappointing season but everyone seems pretty conformable in blaming that alone for his average season.
The guys testical was split open, he played out the season having to wear a cricket box, which would have been uncomfortable on top of the fact he was recovering from having his testical split open from an impact with a knee. I'd rather break a leg than go through what dougie went through.
I think we all know what the injury was and I think most of us would take another serious injury over that but you only have to look at how quick he returned (he missed 3 odd weeks? 1 home and away game). As I just said above, you'd let him off if he started slow and finished the year strong, putting it down to the injury but his was average the entire season and it's something I don't think can be single-handedly blamed on the injury.
 
I don't think can be single-handedly blamed on the injury.

Protective boxes aren't designed for sports like Aussie Rules, they are designed for sports with much less running like Cricket and baseball. When you have been playing football for almost 20 years and have never had to wear a box and suddenly have to wear one, it would be distracting and uncomfortable to say the least.
 
Protective boxes aren't designed for sports like Aussie Rules, they are designed for sports with much less running like Cricket and baseball. When you have been playing football for almost 20 years and have never had to wear a box and suddenly have to wear one, it would be distracting and uncomfortable to say the least.
Not too mention those sports you mentioned are not "contact" sports and mainly involve "straight line" running , and basically no ducking and weaving or sudden changes of direction in full flight either
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Justin Reid has said we won't sell the farm for one player so assuming Danger gets an over the top contract we won't match it.
His terminology is sadly reminiscent of a former employee when discussing the re signing of one Kurt Tippett.
 
I think it should be - In Roo we trust

"We'll get the contract right, we'll pay [Dangerfield] what he needs to be paid, but we've got to get the culture, environment and everything right so that he can win a premiership, because he wants to win one," Ricciuto said.


"In regards to his contract with the Crows, Dangerfield stressed he wanted to stay with the Crows when his current deal expires at the end of next season.
'I love the city, I love the club, I love playing there. And that's all that needs to be said.' "

I'm sick of hearing about how he wants a premiership and how we have to do our best to give him one. I want to hear that he wants to stay to try and win a premiership for the club because we need one and it would mean a lot to the city.

He has never said he wanted to stay. He's been very careful with his choice of words when talking about his future. I'm not saying he'll go, but he certainly hasn't indicated one way or the other.
 
I'm sick of hearing about how he wants a premiership and how we have to do our best to give him one. I want to hear that he wants to stay to try and win a premiership for the club because we need one and it would mean a lot to the city.

But have you heard that we need to deliver him one from anyone of note? Or are you reading the Advertiser?

Have you heard Dangerfield ever say that he doesn't want to be part of bringing the next premiership to Adelaide?

And as far as "mean a lot to the city" ... we should be rooting for Western Bulldogs / St Kilda / Melbourne / Richmond, god knows it would mean as much to their supporters as any.
 
I think it should be -
..."In regards to his contract with the Crows, Dangerfield stressed he wanted to stay with the Crows when his current deal expires at the end of next season.
'I love the city, I love the club, I love playing there. And that's all that needs to be said.' "

That's terrific. Where did the quote come from?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Not enough respect been shown to Dougy here. He is a best and fairest and was runner up in the B&F in 2013 and make the inital AA squad. Last season he had is injury which effected his year.
To say we wouldnt miss Dougy if he left is such a crock.

Was thinking this exact thing myself.

One of those under the radar midfielders that never receive the attention they should, but are hard working and will cut you to pieces if you're not careful. We saw this in 2013 definitely. These players are integral to sides that want to go deep in September. Need those experienced and talented campaigners.

You don't trade him now.
 
Your a tough marker..

Do you know the full extent of the "injury"???

Do you know exactly how long he had to wear the cricket/martial arts box for during the season??

Do you know for sure that having to wear it didn't impact his form??

Whilst the site of the injury may have healed do you know the full effect of it on the players psyche???

Healed in body maybe, but mind??

Let's not kid ourselves this was a very serious injury putting his future parentage aspirations at risk and requiring urgent surgery.
I remember in Tyson Edwards last year he was having an average year and I jumped on his back about it and was one of the people calling for him to be dropped for good. Then the story came out about him having testicular cancer and having a nut removed and I felt like shit, and I then wondered how the hell he even got to training under those conditions. Im gonna give Dougy the benefit of the doubt on this one.
 
A hypothetical:

Lets say he doesn't sign on and someone has been building a war chest and come at him with a godfather offer. They frontload it so its a massive amount in the first year, say 2 million or more.

Would we be in a position to match those terms and force a trade for fair compensation, or would we have to submit due to insufficient liquidity after tying down Tex, Sloane etc? To me it seems like it would be hard to defend against a well constructed FA raid planned from a long way out and spearheaded by massive frontloading.
 
A hypothetical:

Lets say he doesn't sign on and someone has been building a war chest and come at him with a godfather offer. They frontload it so its a massive amount in the first year, say 2 million or more.

Would we be in a position to match those terms and force a trade for fair compensation, or would we have to submit due to insufficient liquidity after tying down Tex, Sloane etc? To me it seems like it would be hard to defend against a well constructed FA raid planned from a long way out and spearheaded by massive frontloading.
Except a heavily front loaded contract may have tax implications which mean less in the pocket than a smooth distribution of funds.

Not exactly sure how sports people's tax works. But tax considerations have to be brought into account.
 
A hypothetical:

Lets say he doesn't sign on and someone has been building a war chest and come at him with a godfather offer. They frontload it so its a massive amount in the first year, say 2 million or more.

Would we be in a position to match those terms and force a trade for fair compensation, or would we have to submit due to insufficient liquidity after tying down Tex, Sloane etc? To me it seems like it would be hard to defend against a well constructed FA raid planned from a long way out and spearheaded by massive frontloading.
Simple. We wouldn't match a heavily front loaded contract. Danger is pretty valuable but he's not the whole team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom