jmac70
On the porch
Can we agree to disagree too?
No. Everyone must agree with me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can we agree to disagree too?
To be fair he hasn't proven anything in a legitimate senior game yet, he was very good last pre season as well, then when the real stuff started he didn't do much at all.
Is everyone in agreement on this?
I think we worked out some time ago that Gault was hopeless. The only thing to do now is to hang on and hope that we're proven correct. This isnt the time to change course midstreams. I'd argue that any glint of good play by Gault should only motivate us to re-double our efforts to get him off the list...
Going on form in the Intra Club and 3 NAB games, I wouldn't be selecting Pendlebury, Crisp, or Grundy but the reality is they are definitely in the mix and would be hard to not select.
Not sure what Gault has done wrong so far and think he deserves a game.
Up to him then to keep his spot.
Based on form and effort over Summer, Gault, Blairy and perhaps even Sinkers deserve a Rd1 berth. Before mid-season I'd like to think that all will be pushed out by the likes of Howe/Cox/Grundy (for Gault), Broomhead/Aish (for Blair) and Ramsay/Maynard/Marsh (for Sinkers). If that happens, we'll be evolving into a serious finals contender.This is what I mean.
Unless Buckley's expectations on him were kicking 83 goals, laying 75 tackles, getting 98 hitouts and running 63 km, I"m not sure what else Gault could have done to deserve the promotion.
3rd highest goalkicker in the comp during the NAB
Was more than adequate in ruckcontests
Put forward pressure
even ran back into defence on a few occasions
Took contested marks
Now of course, if he once again fails to convert that form into senior form, then yeah, he's probably done at the end of 2016, but as of right now, it's very hard to argue he doesn't deserve both the promotion and a Round 1 spot.
I think most of us would argue that the problem with Gault is that he started off with a "soft-penis" attitude and it's hard to come back and be loved by the collingwood faithful. Had he displayed some mongrel when he first got to the club, I would be willing to cut him some slack, but I just can't bring myself to say that he should be given a chance unless he does something good like breaking someone's jaw in a VFL game.
Personally, I don't want him selected because I'm not sure how to say his name. Does it rhyme with salt, or is it gall with a t at the end?
It rhymes with salt. Gault's other problem is that he smiles too much, and has nice teeth. He's been to the Steele Sidebottom School of Endless Smiling, whereas he should take some follow up classes at Jamie Elliott's Taciturn College.
It rhymes with salt. Gault's other problem is that he smiles too much, and has nice teeth. He's been to the Steele Sidebottom School of Endless Smiling, whereas he should take some follow up classes at Jamie Elliott's Taciturn College.
It rhymes with salt. Gault's other problem is that he smiles too much, and has nice teeth. He's been to the Steele Sidebottom School of Endless Smiling, whereas he should take some follow up classes at Jamie Elliott's Taciturn College.
Gault will kick more goals than Cloke v Sydney.
Gault will kick more goals than Cloke v Sydney.
The objective is to kick more goals than Sydney. If Cloke, Gault and Moore function well as a forward line then we migh just win. It's not important who kicks the most goals.
We are on the brink of the new season and all you appear interested in is sniping players
Now of course, if he once again fails to convert that form into senior form, then yeah, he's probably done at the end of 2016, but as of right now, it's very hard to argue he doesn't deserve both the promotion and a Round 1 spot.
This site has gone stir crazy.