- Oct 6, 2012
- 13,003
- 25,587
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
That's a much more measured response compared to your usual response to one of my anti-Mackay threads.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a much more measured response compared to your usual response to one of my anti-Mackay threads.
You can keep him.
We finished 5th on the ladder this year with zero top 10 picks on our list. Sure as hell not going and finding one to give to you guys for Gibbs.
Not really ......need to understand after signing a longterm contract, why they're even considering the matter ......they may be forced to free up TPP
Problem is, we obviously wouldn't let him go for that.
If you guys are ready for a flag now, and are missing a few key pieces, you should be throwing your draft picks to get these players.
Look at what Hawthorn did. They haven't had a top 20 pick since 2010 when they got Isaac Smith at 19.
Is that not the goal? To win a flag? In an 18 team comp, you don't win it anymore by sitting on your hand.
If I was in your shoes, I would be throwing picks to get Martin/Gibbs/Rockliff etc
Adelaide have done the hardest part already and have a spine sorted.
That's just my opinion, you guys are close, take the chance and have a crack at the flag now before GWS take the next 10.
What are you basing that on?
He's a bloody good player and we should be going hard for him if there's even a chance he would come back to Adelaide.
I'm sick of playing safe - lets go balls to the wall for a flag.
Get Rockliff and Wells too.
If AFC miraculously managed to stumble across a top 10 pick and then traded it away I reckon there would be a riot *I can see us trading #13 to Carlton for Gibbs.
I can't see us trading our way into the top-10, and then giving that pick away. Not a snowball's chance in Hell of that happening.
If AFC miraculously managed to stumble across a top 10 pick and then traded it away I reckon there would be a riot *
* unless Dustin Martin was the one we gave it away for
Honestly, probably not. I'd want (and expect) it to be a top 10 pick (Port have 10 and that wound do). Thats about fair for 5 years of A grade talent during a premiership window.
You'd probably have to bundle 13/14 or whatever with a player for a pick inside the top 10, or include a future second (probably looking like a pick in the early 30's) - maybe with an early third (a pick in the early 40's) coming back your way or something.
I get what youre saying, but I, like a few others disagree. This mid at pick 13 is a 5 year investment. The core that we have now will all be in their 30's or pushing it by then. Pick 13 may be a dud, or they may pull a Dangerfield. Or they may turn out to be a gun, who stays, but then we're back to the start of the cycle, having not won a flag, trying to assemble more talent around this pick.
We have invested heavily at the draft since Craig and Alan Stewart came to the club about 10 years ago. We've lost more talent at trades than weve gained which has set us back. If there are talented players in their prime, wanting to come here now, we must get them. Id much rather the club try to ice the cake now and fail, and have to go to a rebuild in a few years, than stick to this neverending cycle. We can invest in youth again, next year, or the year after, or the one after that. There will always be a first rounder for us (barring another Tippettgate), but premiership windows are fleeting.
Slightly spicy proposal incoming. Not suggesting Lynch wants to leave/that I want him to leave, but what would both sides say to:
Lynch + 14 + Grigg (rumoured DFA pick up) to Carlton
Gibbs + 23 to Adelaide
To be fair it was one of ours who suggested it.
Madness
I'm the mad one, I'm merely proposing what it would take to bring across a very good midfielder that Carlton still have full control over for another two years. If the AFC think that price is too high, then Gibbs will likely remain a Blue next year and that could well be the best outcome for all involved. Personally I don't think packaging 14 with lesser lights will get us close enough. I also think he'd be an extremely handy addition to our midfield unit.
Or its called keeping the status quo. The one that has not brought us success in a long time.I think we're drafting pretty well so I'd back our team in to get another gun at that spot and that gun will be playing for years after Gibbs retires. That's called smart list management.
Yea if we never demanded a top 10 pick from Geelong for danger, we would be mad to chase a top 10 pick for Gibbs. Even considering the contract status of bothIf AFC miraculously managed to stumble across a top 10 pick and then traded it away I reckon there would be a riot *
* unless Dustin Martin was the one we gave it away for
Get em bothI think I might have said this briefly in a post earlier today, but IMO we need two more players (or more) in order to raise our midfield to premiership worthy. One contested, pressuring, clearance-winning, big-bodied midfielder to provide some grunt and pressure in the contest, taking pressure off the likes of Sloane and Crouch x2 in the process. As well as this, we need to find a balanced mid who can provide great skills, but can also play well inside, win clearances, tackle and accumulate if needed. This is Rockliff and Gibbs, respectively, to a tee.
If the players that I expect to improve do so, Sloane, Rockliff, Gibbs, Brouch, Mrouch, Cameron, Smith, Milera, Greenwood, Atkins, Knight is a very, VERY good potential midfield
This starts Clubs self destroying. Why on earth would you trade one of your most popular, loyal, liked player in the top 6 in the club to bring in a player past his prime and who has consistently demeaned the Crows in the past. Strange how the Crows could suddenly be ok if they paid the contract price that Carlton is paying him. No Thanks!Slightly spicy proposal incoming. Not suggesting Lynch wants to leave/that I want him to leave, but what would both sides say to:
Lynch + 14 + Grigg (rumoured DFA pick up) to Carlton
Gibbs + 23 to Adelaide
Adelaide hasn't done very well with former Carlton players, so I don't see why they should do the Blues any favours at the trade table this time round.
Nobody doubts Adelaide's ability to draft a gun player at pick #13. The problem is that our premiership window is 2017-2019, and it's unlikely that the youngster we draft this year will be developed enough to help us win a flag in that timeframe.I think we're drafting pretty well so I'd back our team in to get another gun at that spot and that gun will be playing for years after Gibbs retires. That's called smart list management.
Yeah nah lynchy staysThis starts Clubs self destroying. Why on earth would you trade one of your most popular, loyal, liked player in the top 6 in the club to bring in a player past his prime and who has consistently demeaned the Crows in the past. Strange how the Crows could suddenly be ok if they paid the contract price that Carlton is paying him. No Thanks!
This "smart list management" has won us nothing in decades.I think we're drafting pretty well so I'd back our team in to get another gun at that spot and that gun will be playing for years after Gibbs retires. That's called smart list management.
He's also contracted till 2019, all reports indicate he's happy to stay in any event, and there are two clubs in SA we would be talking to.
Turned 27 this year, 200 gamer, BnF winner, numerous top 5 finishes in same, averages 27 (quality) disposals per game. He's A grade talent (not Elite though; I reserve that for the likes of Judd, Hodge, Danger, GAJ etc).
If you guys think you're in a premiership window over the next 5 years, then adding him to your side is a no-brainer.
Personally, and I know I'll get howled down for this, but I would have though a pick around the 10 mark would be ball park, so we would at least have a 50/50 chance of getting someone as good (but younger).
I'd cough up pick 10 for him if I was in your clubs position in a heartbeat. Maybe thats just me.