Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Trade & F/A - 2017/2018 - Refreshed (cont in part 2)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn't Scharenberg have foot injuries when we drafted him?
Yes foot problems, needed an operation to fix in the end l believe
 
The report made it sound like an impact injury. That doesn't mean it isn't an ACL, but it would at least avoid any suggestion that he's particularly vulnerable to ACL injuries.

Edit: He was reportedly stretchered off, hope he's okay.

Sorry, missed your post earlier. We will wait and see. Fingers crossed for the kid.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Yes but said to be Fine when we Drafted Him then had the 2 ACL's

We sent him off for foot surgery before he'd played a game. It was a calculated risk to take him. My job is essentially risk assessment and he gives me the heeebie jeebies in hindsight.

I'm stoked that he's now playing good footy. Here's to a long and fruitful career!
 
Heard a rumour Collingwood is chasing Andrew Gaff.

He and McGovern are 25yo RFAs who will have a lot of money thrown at them this season. McGovern doesn't have the go home factor Gaff does obviously.

Gaff sounds like he's seriously considering it.
 
Sloane, gaff and Lynch only the best will do.
But seriously doubt that we would be chasing to many other than Lynch if available
 
I wouldn't think Gaff is on our agenda. Our weaknesses lie largely at key position and with proven goal kickers. This is where our focus needs to be this trade and draft period.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Once in a blue moon I know a thing or two about a situation with a player

Yeah and... what he's a Melbourne supporter, you know him personally?
 
I wouldn't think Gaff is on our agenda. Our weaknesses lie largely at key position and with proven goal kickers. This is where our focus needs to be this trade and draft period.

But if Lynch costs us two first rounders, and Gaff gets to us as a FA and we keep our first, you'd chose the Gaff option wouldn't you.

I agree we are thin on KPP's but we have quality over quantity IMO.
 
But if Lynch costs us two first rounders, and Gaff gets to us as a FA and we keep our first, you'd chose the Gaff option wouldn't you.

I agree we are thin on KPP's but we have quality over quantity IMO.

Gaff will cost us. He's only restricted. So the salary will be high and i'd be reluctant to go there unless it were for a key position. I wouldn't choose Gaff. I'm not sure i'd pay that for Lynch either but it's worth consideration.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

But if Lynch costs us two first rounders, and Gaff gets to us as a FA and we keep our first, you'd chose the Gaff option wouldn't you.

I agree we are thin on KPP's but we have quality over quantity IMO.

Lynch is Needed but we don't really need Gaff
 
He’ll still go top 10.

Bonar went 11 and King looks better so you'd think so. Bonar was back and playing good footy pre-draft, so if it was worst case scenario and King missed the whole year it would be interesting.

Any more news on King?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom