Come on, we preferred to take a chance on a yank 210 cm player who had never kicked a footy compared to a father son key position prospect.
Would prefer Stewart in the side over Cox.
Hold on. One cost us nothing (he was an international rookie), the other would have. Not sure why they are being used as a comparison.
I'm not arguing the merits of one over the other here, but you can't use these two recruits as comparisons.






