BrisbaneCFC
Norm Smith Medallist
- Sep 1, 2016
- 7,519
- 11,380
- AFL Club
- Carlton
But we do need a KPP.
We are one short IMO.
And CC can go onball.
BSOS? who half the board has been foaming about for 12 months.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
But we do need a KPP.
We are one short IMO.
And CC can go onball.
Broke his leg in his first season. Was BOG in the third game of his second season and then won the B&F that year.Correct. Have a look at Cripps who took a couple of years to really cement his spot.
Lets say Luko ends up being every bit as good as a Nick Riewoldt...
I still don't think Riewoldts career is anywhere near as good if he wasn't being fed by...
Hayes, Dal Santo, Goddard, Jones, Gram, Ball
We need mids... we have invested in height.. we need to get the engine room going
Luko? How familiar have we become with our pick already?
Lets say Luko ends up being every bit as good as a Nick Riewoldt...
I still don't think Riewoldts career is anywhere near as good if he wasn't being fed by...
Hayes, Dal Santo, Goddard, Jones, Gram, Ball
We need mids... we have invested in height.. we need to get the engine room going
Mate, they gave up pick 2 for a better than average player in last years trade period (Weller I think)
They’ve had way more top 20 picks than we’ve had over the last 3 years. Their list composition is still relatively young.
Whilst I can’t see pick 1 for 4&5 I could see say pick 1/22 for 4&5 in drafts gone by recently but Having said that, Lukosius isn’t the only gun tall in this draft and all depends how big a boner they would have for him.
We may get lucky...but then SOS May have his own boner for him!!
Broke his leg in his first season. Was BOG in the third game of his second season and then won the B&F that year.
Was a slow burn alright
They gave up 2 because he was the first bloke tp want to go up there.Mate, they gave up pick 2 for a better than average player in last years trade period (Weller I think)
They’ve had way more top 20 picks than we’ve had over the last 3 years. Their list composition is still relatively young.
Whilst I can’t see pick 1 for 4&5 I could see say pick 1/22 for 4&5 in drafts gone by recently but Having said that, Lukosius isn’t the only gun tall in this draft and all depends how big a boner they would have for him.
We may get lucky...but then SOS May have his own boner for him!!
BSOS? who half the board has been foaming about for 12 months.
For those who have watched Luko is he really that much better than all the other highly rated KPP prospects of the past 5-10 years?
At worst could he be a Jack Watts?
We have enough 1 footed players at the moment without adding another. Call me old fashioned, but it really pisses me off when someone has a clear and open path to kick the ball, but has to stop and turn back into traffic because they can't kick with the opposite foot.This is why Rankine is #1 for me.
Has goal kicking mid written all over him.
For those who have watched Luko is he really that much better than all the other highly rated KPP prospects of the past 5-10 years?
At worst could he be a Jack Watts?
Have rated Lukosius number 1 pick, before the start of this season, but given where our list is at, why would we trade out any of our young talented kids, just doesn't make sense
No way.
If i had to decide between keeping Harry and drafting a mid, or trading Harry and drafting Lukosius, i'd choose the former.
Harry is showing some good signs at AFL level and we've got a couple years into him. People overhype draftees all the time...Boyd was meant to take the competition by storm and he hasn't. Lukosius is lean and agile...he could be a star or he could be Jack Watts who went pick 1 due to similar attributes.
Bottom line is in zero scenarios should we be trading Harry.
Unless that abundance is a highly sought after commodity, which you can then trade for needs.Your view, personally holding an abundance of assets in one area, whilst having significant weaknesses in others would not make sense to me!
Most agree with you - I simply don't. TDK is a Forward ruck, Kerr a forward, Charlie a forward, Harry a forward, Lukosius a forward, BSOS a forward, JSOS currently only ever shown talent as a forward, and Levi a forward. In my eyes, the only one remotely capable of been considered anything but a key forward is charlie, as he is agile and quick enough. That is 8 key forwards on your list - yuck!! You simply can't have midfield numbers, let alone midfield depths with that list composition.
So for me I'd take Luk and Walsh (harry out), rather than Harry and Luk.
Comparison to Boyd and Watts is just wrong - very little in common.
Boyd was a big strong forward who bullied kids less developed out of the goal square.
Watts was a lean kid who again bullied smaller kids predominately in school football and then again in U18 football.
Lukosius is a lean, agile powerful running tall forward playing well in SANFL.
However, as i started, most on here agree with you - zero scenario's should we trade Harry. I just personally think that is closed minded.