Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mills 25 touches, 2 tackles, 1 goal, 7 clearances, 2 clangers 80% DE - 88 points
Ridscab 28 touches, 0 tackles, 0 goals, 0 clearances, 3 clangers, 78% DE - 123 points
Doesn't pay to be a midfielder who impacts the game, 2nd most clearances on the ground, big at stoppages, lays tackles and wins his own footy gaiz
But he algoruimrthtghmgbm rm guysMills 25 touches, 2 tackles, 1 goal, 7 clearances, 2 clangers 80% DE - 88 points
Ridscab 28 touches, 0 tackles, 0 goals, 0 clearances, 3 clangers, 78% DE - 123 points
Doesn't pay to be a midfielder who impacts the game, 2nd most clearances on the ground, big at stoppages, lays tackles and wins his own footy gaiz
His team won over 4 quarters.Scored harshly in 2nd half coz he did eff all I think.
I'm thinking the opposite, that the weightings are the same but don't suit the different style of football. With the current scoring system, higher DE% and more marks is meaning they're approaching the 3300 target a lot quicker. So in a close game, giving the big points to the big moments (eg Buddy went from 57 to 81 with that goal) means they're literally stripping those points off everyone else to keep it close to the 3300.4/367
Will probably field Powell over Campbell's 49
Another game with a close finish where a final quarter with only a few touches has seen massive down scaling of players' scores instead of the usual modest gains. Very similar to what happened in the Adelaide/Gold Coast match last week. Something has changed with the weighting.
Traded out Cox to get CJ in. Good stuff Fred, ya kent
His team won over 4 quarters.
He was huge for 80% of the game.
How did Zerrett end up on 104? I swear he was like 116 last I checked.
A sign of the end of days.Wow. Lloyd did better n fantasy than in SuperCoach.
That's probably true. There's been a few games where we've known the total has reached 3300 with a few minutes to go and we've seen points taken from players who aren't touching the ball to get points for the ones who are.I'm thinking the opposite, that the weightings are the same but don't suit the different style of football. With the current scoring system, higher DE% and more marks is meaning they're approaching the 3300 target a lot quicker. So in a close game, giving the big points to the big moments (eg Buddy went from 57 to 81 with that goal) means they're literally stripping those points off everyone else to keep it close to the 3300.
Just my thoughts.
Wait wut...Merrett scaled down to 104 cheating scum
This.I'm thinking the opposite, that the weightings are the same but don't suit the different style of football. With the current scoring system, higher DE% and more marks is meaning they're approaching the 3300 target a lot quicker. So in a close game, giving the big points to the big moments (eg Buddy went from 57 to 81 with that goal) means they're literally stripping those points off everyone else to keep it close to the 3300.
Just my thoughts.
Lloyd scaled down to 100 too. fu** you, CD. ******* pieces of sh*t.
Mother *rsMerrett scaled down to 104 cheating scum
Someone doesn’t have Merrett at CD