Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 22: Insert Blame Here

[Gethelred]

<-- Part 21 "Alien vs Predator" can be found here.

Mod Notice

Thread monitored proactively. Users who drag it down will be removed. REPORT posts. Don't exacerbate.	Specifically: reference to TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome), 'Trumpanzee' or similar are longer allowed.	Personal attacks are also to be kept to a minimum.
<- 2024 Election Thread	<- Kamala Harris Concedes	<-- See Part 21.

This thread is not about Covid, lockdowns, or vaccines. While Trump was in office during the pandemic and his response to Covid is relevant, there are pertinent threads for you to post your opinions on those topics.

On SRP you are responsible for backing up/verifying your claims to fact. What this means is that you will be asked time to time to support your claims with evidence, to ensure that this forum is as free of misinfomation as we can make it.

Do not post conspiracy theories on this forum. We have an entire other forum for that.

Thanks all.

 

[MPMonkeys]

View attachment 2482696

That is a fact though, isn't it?
Its not ground breaking.

 

[MPMonkeys]

What? He did everything he could to block the release of the files until he knew the Senate had the numbers, then flip flopped.

The excuses his supporters make for him are incredible.

But he could still block them if he wanted to, so he hasn't done 'everything he could'.

 

[Gough]

1. He was talking to another reporter whose name is Peggy Collins who is part of the general WH press pack.
2. 'Demanded the execution of senators and congressman' - I think that exists in your imagination.
3. How has he flip flopped on the Epstein files? He said they would be released and he has signed for their release. Not exactly sure what you are complaining about here.
4. 'Defended the murder of an American' Again this exists in your imagination.

This thread never fails to make me laugh. Its just a cobbled together diatrobe of X screenshots from nobodys, ridiculous conspiracy theories and predictions of things that he will do that never happen and are quickly forgotten about.

Do you admire Trump because he rapes children or steals from one's with cancer.

 

[Aussie in exile]

whitehouse barbie says he was joking

Geez has there ever been a dumber White House spokesperson?

 

[liz]

But he could still block them if he wanted to, so he hasn't done 'everything he could'.

Has he released them yet? Until then, he continues to block their release.

He was quite within his rights to order them released without the act he’s just signed. It’s not like it’s given him a new power to do so.

 

[Satan]

But he could still block them if he wanted to, so he hasn't done 'everything he could'.

there will be a shortage of black ink after the files are released

 

[Satan]

Geez has there ever been a dumber White House spokesperson?

Kayleigh says hi

 

[MPMonkeys]

Has he released them yet? Until then, he continues to block their release.

He was quite within his rights to order them released without the act he’s just signed. It’s not like it’s given him a new power to do so.

Surely there needs to be some due process first. Everything would need to be checked and verified. Its not like Epstein was a first class character who had never told a lie in his life. Otherwise there is a possibility that hundreds of people could have their names dragged through the mud based on lies.

 

[MPMonkeys]

Geez has there ever been a dumber White House spokesperson?

As a woman and as as a person of color who is also queer......

 

[Royces Hart]

Surely there needs to be some due process first. Everything would need to be checked and verified. Its not like Epstein was a first class character who had never told a lie in his life. Otherwise there is a possibility that hundreds of people could have their names dragged through the mud based on lies.

Oh, you’ve suddenly developed an issue with people who lie?

 

[MPMonkeys]

Oh, you’ve suddenly developed an issue with people who lie?

I'm not sure what your point is. Are you advocating that all criminal case notes should be released prior to any investigation being completed or due diligence on the veracity of them being done first?

Its simple common sense. Not rocket science really.

And I'm sure that once released, every single person names will claim that it is rubbish and/or its been taken out of context. We've already seen two examples this week with Hakeem Jeffries and Epsteins donations to him and the Democrat senator who was texting Epstein live during a hearing.

Personally I don't see the point in releasing them as it will just go around in circles and innocent people are likely to have their names smeared. Or on the flip side, people will just claim some files have been withheld because it doesn't suit their narrative.

And its going to hurt the Democrats far more than the Republicans.

 

[Aussie in exile]

there will be a shortage of black ink after the files are released

I have no doubt that donny rump's White House team will be looking for a technicality as to why ALL THE FIles can't be released.
Watch this space

 

[Satan]

I'm not sure what your point is. Are you advocating that all criminal case notes should be released prior to any investigation being completed or due diligence on the veracity of them being done first?

Its simple common sense. Not rocket science really.

And I'm sure that once released, every single person names will claim that it is rubbish and/or its been taken out of context. We've already seen two examples this week with Hakeem Jeffries and Epsteins donations to him and the Democrat senator who was texting Epstein live during a hearing.

Personally I don't see the point in releasing them as it will just go around in circles and innocent people are likely to have their names smeared. Or on the flip side, people will just claim some files have been withheld because it doesn't suit their narrative.

And its going to hurt the Democrats far more than the Republicans.

unlike kaz

 

[Royces Hart]

I'm not sure what your point is. Are you advocating that all criminal case notes should be released prior to any investigation being completed or due diligence on the veracity of them being done first?

Its simple common sense. Not rocket science really.

And I'm sure that once released, every single person names will claim that it is rubbish and/or its been taken out of context. We've already seen two examples this week with Hakeem Jeffries and Epsteins donations to him and the Democrat senator who was texting Epstein live during a hearing.

Personally I don't see the point in releasing them as it will just go around in circles and innocent people are likely to have their names smeared. Or on the flip side, people will just claim some files have been withheld because it doesn't suit their narrative.

And its going to hurt the Democrats far more than the Republicans.

No mention of the victims, telling.

 

[Maggie5]

1. He was talking to another reporter whose name is Peggy Collins who is part of the general WH press pack.
2. 'Demanded the execution of senators and congressman' - I think that exists in your imagination.
3. How has he flip flopped on the Epstein files? He said they would be released and he has signed for their release. Not exactly sure what you are complaining about here.
4. 'Defended the murder of an American' Again this exists in your imagination.

This thread never fails to make me laugh. Its just a cobbled together diatrobe of X screenshots from nobodys, ridiculous conspiracy theories and predictions of things that he will do that never happen and are quickly forgotten about.

1. The reporter's name is Catherine Lucey, not even close to Piggy. Research is your friend.

2. Satan has already addressed that.

3. Didn't really have a position except to call it a hoax. There wasn't any need for both houses to vote, he could have done it at any time by Executive Order. The flip flop came in when he knew that both houses had the vote and suggested Republicans vote for it, no need as it was a done deal. He was trying to save face. Anyway, he conveniently has called for investigation to be opened into Democrats purely to delay release. Oh and by the way, he was a Democrat himself during that time. Will he investigate himself?

4. Listen to his answer to the question ... his response “a lot of people didn’t like that gentleman, (Khashoggi), things happen". This is despite his own US Intelligence Service (during Trump's first Presidency) stating the the Prince and his henchmen were responsible.

 

[bourbons]

3. How has he flip flopped on the Epstein files?

notsureifserious.jpg

 

[Maggie5]

As a woman and as as a person of color who is also queer......

Who are your referring to is is this an example of your bigotry and racism?
Who in the world still uses the word 'queer' ?

 

[bourbons]

But he could still block them if he wanted to, so he hasn't done 'everything he could'.

He could have just released them himself at any stage over the last 9 months too. Still can, whats he wasting time with this vote and process for?

He did everything he could to deflect, distract and not release them up to the point where it was made clear to him he couldn't wrangle his congress into continuing to support him by voting no.

Come on mate, you're not this dumb.

 

[Satan]

Did everything he could up to the point where it was made clear to him he couldn't wrangle his congress into continuing to support him by voting no.

Come on mate, you're not this dumb.

russian bot ?

 

[jannissary]

I'm not sure what your point is. Are you advocating that all criminal case notes should be released prior to any investigation being completed or due diligence on the veracity of them being done first?

Its simple common sense. Not rocket science really.

And I'm sure that once released, every single person names will claim that it is rubbish and/or its been taken out of context. We've already seen two examples this week with Hakeem Jeffries and Epsteins donations to him and the Democrat senator who was texting Epstein live during a hearing.

Personally I don't see the point in releasing them as it will just go around in circles and innocent people are likely to have their names smeared. Or on the flip side, people will just claim some files have been withheld because it doesn't suit their narrative.

And its going to hurt the Democrats far more than the Republicans.

kind of defeats your entire 'argument' when trump specifically ran on a platform of releasing the epstein files. the fact it's his 2nd year and he hasn't indicates a "flip flop"

 

[Baldur]

Firm Tied to Kristi Noem Secretly Got Money From $220 Million DHS Ad Contracts

The company is run by the husband of Noem’s chief DHS spokesperson and has personal and business ties to Noem and her aides. DHS invoked the “emergency” at the border to skirt competitive bidding rules for the taxpayer-funded campaign.

www.propublica.org

It appears that the puppy killer is corrupt. Just another day in Trumpland.

 

[MPMonkeys]

1. The reporter's name is Catherine Lucey, not even close to Piggy. Research is your friend.

2. Satan has already addressed that.

3. Didn't really have a position except to call it a hoax. There wasn't any need for both houses to vote, he could have done it at any time by Executive Order. The flip flop came in when he knew that both houses had the vote and suggested Republicans vote for it, no need as it was a done deal. He was trying to save face. Anyway, he conveniently has called for investigation to be opened into Democrats purely to delay release. Oh and by the way, he was a Democrat himself during that time. Will he investigate himself?

4. Listen to his answer to the question ... his response “a lot of people didn’t like that gentleman, (Khashoggi), things happen". This is despite his own US Intelligence Service (during Trump's first Presidency) stating the the Prince and his henchmen were responsible.

1, No - a reporter called Peggy Collins was nearby asking questions. The audio is quite clear.

2. Satan addressed nothing. He suggested that Trump has ordered a summary execution of an elected representative without due process. Clearly that is incorrect.

3. Yes, he could have done it by executive order but as stated he would then be accused of bypassing due process when inevitably innocent people would have been smeared because the files weren't verified. Is this what you are advocating? Any accusation (no matter how outlandish) be released into the public domain? Lets go back to the Salem Witch Trials, shall we?

4. He did not defend the murder of an American. You are both projecting. Did he say the murder was justified?

 

[MPMonkeys]

Who are your referring to is is this an example of your bigotry and racism?
Who in the world still uses the word 'queer' ?

Karine Jean Pierre

 

[Royces Hart]

Come on mate, you're not this dumb.

 

[myblueroan]

What? He did everything he could to block the release of the files until he knew the Senate had the numbers, then flip flopped.

The excuses his supporters make for him are incredible.

I wouldn't bother engaging. You end up dragged down rabbit holes. It is all indefensible. As someone who tried for years with one of the worst, I recommend heading straight to the ignore button. There are better uses for your time and energy.