Picking Jackson makes no sense unless we think he is generational.My biggest concern with Cox going is whether Luke Ryan would also go; if they are going to match each other's stupid hair colours you would think it was a real risk. Ryan is probably our second most important defender right now behind Pearce and is very instrumental to our backline regularly breaking the lines. Of Ryan goes then you are down to Cerra and Wilson to provide the drive, and one will probably graduate to the midfield next year and the other is not playing that great atm.
Having said that, it is clear that Cox becomes one of the biggest talking points around trades; his early form was suggesting he was going to be close to having a similar kind of breakout to what MacCarthy and Taberner have been having, but atm you would think the preference would be for the forward line Hogan, Lobb (with Darcy back in ruck) and one other, with a couple of backups including an understudy (let's say understudy is Dixon). It is probably one too many atm and as mercenary as it sounds now is the best time to cash in on his value. If we could convert him into Logan MacDonald (a top WA mobile tall forward or tall midfield option for 2020) we would be laughing I reckon....
List wise, another real ruck forward option would add a bit of balance and backup to the options around Darcy&Lobb. It makes me wonder, assuming we can get Liam Henry for a second round pick max, do we go for Luke Jackson with our first pick? He is sort of undersized for the ruck which I reckon will see him fall down the order, but his skills and athleticism are good and you could see him as a 60 forward / 40 ruck option and being WA is probably a smaller flight risk. He then replaces Meek on the list who really is too one dimensional (I think we hold onto Jones as a mature bodied ruck option in case of worst case injury scenario).
I'll be amazed if we don't just pick best available mid/flanker this year (if we keep our first).