- Jul 28, 2021
- 1,842
- 1,896
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- LEEDS F’jh#$@G UNITED
Not to mention Hickey droppjng in front.We played Rampe and McCartin on King for most of the night, plus he had no backup. That's a hard matchup for any forward.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not to mention Hickey droppjng in front.We played Rampe and McCartin on King for most of the night, plus he had no backup. That's a hard matchup for any forward.
Based on last week's game - Yes. Based on last night's - No.Based on how we are as a side at the moment, does JPK get another game in the side if back before the end of season?
I was agreeing with you all the way, even clicked like... and then got to the bolded line!Reckon we're being a bit harsh on Max King. Kicked 35 goals for the year, top 5 in the comp, one of the youngest members of a team that was diabolical, gave him s**t supply and didn't look like they cared. Same age as Rowbottom who was a non-factor last night and McInerney who some on here don't even have in our team next week.
King's a quality player and a hard working forward who had a stinker. Big deal.
I was agreeing with you all the way, even clicked like... and then got the bolded line!
Rowbottom had 13 touches, 8 tackles (team highest), 2 score involvements, 2 intercepts and 3 clearances... and you think he was a non-factor?!
And you reckon they're being harsh on King???!!!
Okay, still think you are wrong... I'll accept your numbers as I can't be arsed going to have a look, but saying he was a non-factor is just wrong imo. He played his role and played it well. No brain farts, no missed tackles (that I remember), no dumb fifties or frees. I think you are completely underestimating the discipline in takes to play your role.That is fair KS. I didn't mean it to be harsh. I didn't think he was bad. He just had no impact (which as a mid, you could argue is being bad.)
6 of those touches came in the last quarter when the game was well and truly curtains and he actually started, y'know... going for the ball.
Up to that point he'd had 7 touches, 2 tackles, 0 score involvements and 1 clearance. I really don't think I was being unreasonable saying he was a non-factor. The kid's a gun. Hate the role.
I don't see why we need to do that.He has been fantastic playing as the relief ruckman in the last month, it will be harsh but we have to give Hickey and Ladhams an extended run together to see if it will work.
Why aren't people taking about 3-4 weeks for Jones?
Elected to bump and hit Parker square in the nose.
It was intentional, high, and high impact. What am I missing?
Jones stood his ground and braced for contact so it wasn't intentional. Low impact as Parker played out the gameWhy aren't people taking about 3-4 weeks for Jones?
Elected to bump and hit Parker square in the nose.
It was intentional, high, and high impact. What am I missing?
Okay, still think you are wrong... I'll accept your numbers as I can't be arsed going to have a look, but saying he was a non-factor is just wrong imo. He played his role and played it well. No brain farts, no missed tackles (that I remember), no dumb fifties or frees. I think you are completely underestimating the discipline in takes to play your role.
The whole team played their roles today. They played four quarters of high intensity, high pressure, gritty, determined footy. If they don't, either we don't win or if we do, we scrape on in. This type of game is exactly what we want, week in, week out! No heroes, no superstars, just the boys hunting in packs, putting pressure on every opposition ball movement, strangling their game and allowing us to play ours. If we can kick a little straighter, we start slaughtering teams.
We play like this week in, week out for the next 7 rounds, we are top 4!
So that's why you haven't been online for a while.King is lazy
agreeJones stood his ground and braced for contact so it wasn't intentional. Low impact as Parker played out the game
Tackle and get him high, avoid the fine he'll getI
agree
I don’t think he could have done anything else
Happened pretty quickTackle and get him high, avoid the fine he'll get
Only part I didn't like was he jumped and feet were off the ground when the impact was made. Had he stayed on the ground, I think the impact would have been lessened.I
agree
I don’t think he could have done anything else
IMO Jones shouldn't go for his incident but Rowbottom & JPK were suspended for less, so if there's any equality then he will go for his knock on Parker.
"Equality" hahahahahahahakillmenowhahahahaha
I know it's your obsession this season, but JPK most definitely didn't go for less. Go re-watch the incident if you've forgotten just how severely he hit Docherty.
I have watched it over and over. It was an accident. I'm not denying the severity of the contact, I'm denying the intent behind it. Because I think that is what we should be suspending players for. Intent, not outcomes.