Danger was carrying an injury most of last season. An injured Danger is still better than most non-injured other Cats, or do you disagree with that?
I completely disagree with that. Before you ask as with quite literally every other player in the competition. Honestly, we saw in 1991 with a half-fit Gary Ablett what happens in the modern game. That year he was ok in some games, good in a handful, but in the one final he played that year he simply wasn't a factor, and it was all due to fitness. And that was nearly thirty years ago. The notion that any player - from any club too, not just Geelong - can play unfit players and get away with it should be consigned to history. The game is too demanding, the standard is too high, and the opposition too good to carry any weak links.
I suspect the powers at Geelong know better than all of us how to manage loads and carry crucial players. We really have no idea what he had to endure last season, but I suspect we have seen his best now, and it will be a gradual decline as it is for ALL players. Just saying he should not have played is too simplistic. He could be a potent FF if the need was there.
We'd need to see some evidence of that in a hurry for that to be true. He can't beat key defenders. He can outmark a midfielder who gets isolated, but proper defenders regularly beat him when he's up forward. As tantalising as the notion of him being a great forward is for seemingly an awful lot of people, it doesn't make it true.