Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2016 Draft, Trades and Retirements Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
GWS have more than enough points to match any bid we make, still make their own pick in the first round, then laugh at our attempt

Not if we use picks 14 & 17 to work our way (improving our draft position - Harley) to their true points value of pick 4 or even 6 both of which are held by GC!
It's a clever way of taking advantage of the Hawks desperation. Of course other switching of picks/player that goes over our heads will take place.

Something is happening though. We can no longer deny that!
 
They will go into debt in 2017 not that those bids will happen anyway.

They have good kids next year as well, I think Perryman is the one we could get. Don't think Giants would be that keen to go into debt for Perryman I think he could be surplus as they are getting Deledio in anyway with Shaw and Williams both AA quality in that position.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

They have good kids next year as well, I think Perryman is the one we could get. Don't think Giants would be that keen to go into debt for Perryman I think he could be surplus as they are getting Deledio in anyway with Shaw and Williams both AA quality in that position.

They have so many assets they can get the points needed next season. Perryman is good but he's not 'sell the farm' good
 
They have so many assets they can get the points needed next season. Perryman is good but he's not 'sell the farm' good

I think he fits us the best and really think thats what we are going for. The only other option is we think we can get Scrimshaw with 10.
 
Only thing I can think of is that we hate GWS more than Hawks & really want one of their guns in their academy who really wants to be a Swan!
Most of these kids in their academies would have grown up as Swan supporters so it is feasible that we are targeting such a scenario where we bid on one of their academy guns!
Most of the better prospects are Riverina boys and based on those I've met over the last few years (and I've met quite a few due to football rep teams) very few are/were Swans fans.
 
I think he fits us the best and really think thats what we are going for. The only other option is we think we can get Scrimshaw with 10.

I'd rather take my chance that Scrimshaw is available at 14. Who knows the draft is so even after the top 4.
 
I'd rather take my chance that Scrimshaw is available at 14. Who knows the draft is so even after the top 4.

Unless we got 4 maybe from the GC:

Swans:
get: Pick 4
loose: Pick 14, 17

GC:
Get: Pick 10, 14, 17
Loose: JOM, Pick 4

Hawks:
get: JOM
loose: Pick 10

But with our list turnover I would prefer 2 first round picks
 
Jeez... what a goose to publicly request a trade without having a club ready to go.
 
How embarrassing to tell your employer you want to quit but when you go out to the market all you hear is silence - and everyone else knows that that's all you're hearing!
 
Unless we got 4 maybe from the GC:

Swans:
get: Pick 4
loose: Pick 14, 17

GC:
Get: Pick 10, 14, 17
Loose: JOM, Pick 4

Hawks:
get: JOM
loose: Pick 10

But with our list turnover I would prefer 2 first round picks
I dunno, I'd take that. Would prefer a player of Heeney's caliber over two Jetta's
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Jeez... what a goose to publicly request a trade without having a club ready to go.

I wonder what is better, a senior contract at the expensive Swans or a rookie contract in the cheap city of Melbourne :p
 
I dunno, I'd take that. Would prefer a player of Heeney's caliber over two Jetta's

Dont know if GC would take it though. Doubt they would accept downgrading 4. But the only way I can see it working for us.
 
Unless we got 4 maybe from the GC:

Swans:
get: Pick 4
loose: Pick 14, 17

GC:
Get: Pick 10, 14, 17
Loose: JOM, Pick 4

Hawks:
get: JOM
loose: Pick 10

But with our list turnover I would prefer 2 first round picks

*lose!
 
Caddy to the tigers

Tigers have had a good trade period getting Caddy, Prestia, Nankervis.... Where their list is at they would be happy.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Caddy to the tigers

Will be a multi deal

Touhy for 2017 first
2017 first for Marchbank
2017 first for Deledio
2017 first for Caddy

Pick ends back at Geelong likely
 
Will be a multi deal

Touhy for 2017 first
2017 first for Marchbank
2017 first for Deledio
2017 first for Caddy

Pick ends back at Geelong likely

The deal is already done:

The Tigers gain Caddy and pick 56, with picks 24 and 64 heading to the Cats.
 
I'd rather take my chance that Scrimshaw is available at 14. Who knows the draft is so even after the top 4.

Perryman might be passed on, especially now that Deledio is going there. Pick 10 still might not be enough though. Give me any two of Florent, Perryman, Simpkin, Logue or Bolton and I'm happy. I'm starting to really like the look of Will Heyward too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom