to get you have to give
nothing is for free and no reason for Geelong to feel a sense of entitlement
Tom Lynch.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
to get you have to give
nothing is for free and no reason for Geelong to feel a sense of entitlement
I like this scenario, we still get two higher end picks for Jez and don't set ourselves up to look like difficult traders. Maybe Caldwell is that guy? I'd prefer to keep O'Halloran if possible but if he wants to move this deal is better than any other we'd get for himHonestly if all clubs were measured purely by premierships most clubs would be basketcases. Most supporters just blame you because they didnt like you being set up but that was the afls (correct) call and they dont see the bigger picture. Besides you guys havent had the cultural dramas gc had you have always created a good culture and only lost players for cap reasons (which is no shame).
Back to the topic i think a match would be unlikely..i know its a small point but your compo would be back to back picks (9 and 10) and that gives you good power to address draft needs o doubt your list managers would want to give that up unless they get overruled by someone higher up the chain. Especially given the albeit small risk that if you match he either stays or it ends up in a draft scenario.
What would make more sense is if you match and then a side trade occurs. For example we trade 13 for a player we like that you want to offload (so long as the player isnt worth pick 100 i doubt the afl intervene) or we trade say 13 for later picks from you (this is essentially what the dogs will do with trading down 12 for points so unless the trade is crazily uneven in terms of points the afl cant really do anything) either scenario to me gives both clubs a better outcome than they would get if the compo pick of 10 disappears.
Either way you have a good forward line and i reckon you will do well long term.
If Geelong wins on the weekend and Cameron joins them, do they get trade banned?
He goes from board to board and posts stupid trade ideas. I'm surprised he hasn't infested your's before.Lol. Look at you go. Happy to take Tom Lynch for nothing, but take the moral high ground here. Why are you on here anyway?? Nothing to do with Tigers fans
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Probably just picks.So disappointed but opens up opportunities for others and also enables the cap issues to be lessened somewhat
I would like to see the club push for a trade instead of free agency and not sure who from the Cats would be after a move to Sydney
I like this scenario, we still get two higher end picks for Jez and don't set ourselves up to look like difficult traders. Maybe Caldwell is that guy? I'd prefer to keep O'Halloran if possible but if he wants to move this deal is better than any other we'd get for him
So disappointed but opens up opportunities for others and also enables the cap issues to be lessened somewhat
I would like to see the club push for a trade instead of free agency and not sure who from the Cats would be after a move to Sydney
We're not trading Clark, let alone with any first-round picks.
If we're offering more than GWS offered I don't see why they'd match instead of letting him go and just taking a nice compo pick.
Giants should get a top ten pick and a second rounder minimum.
Nothing - he's just been super busy posting photos of himself and his missus.
Strange timing and look for the skip given what's going on.
I need to change my handle. Won’t be kicking a ton for us.Looks like it's time for me to change my avatar.![]()
Well aware of that GG.It was the end of season awards last night.
Well aware of that GG.
Was more questioning the timing of his posts given he's the captain and what's going on/what he would have been briefed on around that time.
If Adelaide thought Gibbs was worth two first rounders than surely JC is worth at least that.Giants should get a top ten pick and a second rounder minimum.
Here is another thing, if I am Jordan Clark, why would I want to stick around at Geelong? The list is about to hit the wall and go off the cliff and I am not getting an opportunity anyway. You are chasing players like Higgins and Smith to!!! If your not trading Clark is he supposed to remain in the twos??. Clark has not been in your plans why should Clark not want to exit??PLAYERCARDSTART6Jordan Clark
- Age
- 24
- Ht
- 185cm
- Wt
- 83kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 13.7
- 4star
- K
- 9.4
- 4star
- HB
- 4.3
- 3star
- M
- 4.2
- 4star
- T
- 2.6
- 4star
- MG
- 172.0
- 3star
- D
- 12.5
- 3star
- K
- 8.5
- 3star
- HB
- 4.0
- 3star
- M
- 4.0
- 4star
- T
- 1.5
- 2star
- MG
- 172.0
- 3star
- D
- 12.2
- 3star
- K
- 10.4
- 4star
- HB
- 1.8
- 2star
- M
- 3.4
- 4star
- T
- 2.4
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND
No offence but if he was to leave geelong hed pick a lower club where he might getmore gametime not gws where he might not even make the 22.