2020 US Election alleged fraud - OFFICIAL evidence from affidavits ongoing. #stopthesteal

[happy_eagle]

Democrats: ThErE Is No FrAuD!!

GOP: So allow for a forensic audit and prove us wrong

Democrats: You don’t support democracy! Trust the vote!

GOP: So allow for a forensic audit and prove us wrong. If you have nothing to hide, why are you hiding?

Democrats: 您怎么敢质疑我们的权威!

...

I mean no.

GOP: We believe the election was stolen.

Intelligence Agencies: We have found no cases of widespread fraud

GOP: We still believe the election was stolen.

Courts: Okay no problem, prove your case in court.

GOP: Here's a photo of a van and a 4-Chan shitpost.

Courts: Case dismissed

GOP: пошел ты на хуй! фейковые новости из глубокого штата

 

[Ghost Patrol]

Lmao, you have no idea of how the scientific method works. Something being unproved does not necessarily make it false.

Flip flop FyreKraken

 

[happy_eagle]

Lmao, you have no idea of how the scientific method works. Something being unproved does not necessarily make it false.

This isn't a science experiment, its a court of law.
Burden of proof would be a more relevant principle in this case.

 

[Present Not Past]

Lmao, you have no idea of how the scientific method works. Something being unproved does not necessarily make it false.

But you’re innocent until proven guilty.
And that extends in this case to political parties and election officials.
Agree on this tenet of law?

 

[FireKrakouer]

Dunning-Kruger drips off this post. I've lectured on research methods to undergrads.

What's it like teaching gender studies and being a burden on society generally??

 

[Forward Press]

What's it like teaching gender studies and being a burden on society generally??

I love the irony here.

 

[happy_eagle]

What's it like teaching gender studies and being a burden on society generally??

Its posts like this that make me wonder if you have even set foot in a higher education institute.

 

[Generalissimo]

but affidavits

 

[Lebbo73]

Is Jan 6 going to be the date that your 3 month exile from the International Events board starts? Or is it going to be Biden's inauguration day?

On January 6 Trump wins the election. When SCOTUS dismissed the Texas case it set a very clear legal precedent that the power lies with the State legislatures. Each Republican and Democrat State will vote on January 6 giving Trump the election 26 to 23 (or 22).
Don’t read all the tweets below or you might start sweating

 

[Forward Press]

Its posts like this that make me wonder if you have even set foot in a higher education institute.

Why would he? Academics are part of the deep state movement calling for a coup to overthrow the legitimately re-elected Donald Trump and advised the DNC on how to structure their fraudulent ballots so the Supreme Court couldn't see it (but Giuliani could).

 

[happy_eagle]

On January 6 Trump wins the election. When SCOTUS dismissed the Texas case it set a very clear legal precedent that the power lies with the State legislatures. Each Republican and Democrat State will vote on January 6 giving Trump the election 26 to 23 (or 22).
Don’t read all the tweets below or you might start sweating

Cmon you can't be this naïve ?

" The various court filings were never meant to prevail. Their only purpose was to inform the pubic "

What level of chess is this ?

 

[Generalissimo]

Cmon you can't be this naïve ?

" The various court filings were never meant to prevail. Their only purpose was to inform the pubic "

What level of chess is this ?

I any of that whargarble were true, why was it even necessary to send Electoral College cosplayers to state capitals yesterday?

 

[Seeds]

Corporates bribe politicians to bend the rules in their favour

bribery is at a completely insignificiant level. If corporates are caught bribing they end up in jail.

its legal political denotions for campaigning that is the overwhelming problem. And that is legal because politcians enable it to be. Major party campaign funding should be completely paid by tax payers.

why do we refuse to give responsibility to politicans and continue to blame corporates? The corporates are just acting in the rational way the laws dictate. If we blamed politicians someone might actually bother to run on it as a policy and finally fix the problem. As long as we blame corporates nothing will change as corporates dont set the rules. They cant change anything.

 

[Seeds]

It was a quote from Reddit. Thought I'd test the argument here, as the SC tests ideas. You beauty m8.

You arent making a point with that post. Just deflecting. Can you respond?

 

[Monkey King]

What's it like teaching gender studies and being a burden on society generally??

Shouting at clouds mate, not a good look. This comment has zero correlation to my life. It's just a reflection of your own feelings of inadequacy and struggles with reality as you attempt to squeeze things into a little box where you can make sense of it all. Sucks to be you.

 

[Nikita Blue]

Cmon you can't be this naïve ?

" The various court filings were never meant to prevail. Their only purpose was to inform the pubic "

What level of chess is this ?

A tweet that begins with big boom. I don't know what more evidence you need.

 

[BigTacoBandit]

On January 6 Trump wins the election. When SCOTUS dismissed the Texas case it set a very clear legal precedent that the power lies with the State legislatures. Each Republican and Democrat State will vote on January 6 giving Trump the election 26 to 23 (or 22).
Don’t read all the tweets below or you might start sweating

You sound pretty confident. You should make it a 6 month exile from this board if/when Trump loses.

 

[Royces Hart]

Ladies and Gentlemen, shift change has occurred.

FK can pull 24 hour shifts, when he’s on the gear.

 

[Chief]

That it is either untrue, or was concealed adequately

Is this how we should feel about the accusations you stole money from a blind grandmother?

 

[madmug]

Trump's claims aren't based on evidence, they're based on narcissistic fragility.

There is a mountain of evidence that Trump lost those states and there is zero evidence to contradict it.

Our greatest advancements as a species have come from evidence-based knowledge, so I reject your "no one really knows" thinking as little more than the kind of backwards thinking that took man into the Dark Ages and saw heretics burned at the stake.

Comes from the Trumpian lexicon. 'Who knew!'

Of course going into a Court room you have to have more than 'who knew'.

You need evidence. Not Conspiracy crap.

The appointed officials have been through the counts & checks & recounts. The courts take note of the legally appointed officials who have the job of counting & verifying that count. Not of Trupence nufties with nuffin to offer.

The play was to get to the SCOTUS. However, those people have read the constitution. So it went nowhere.

Trumpence will keep this rubbish up whilst still grifting money out the dummies who know no different. Its sad, its destructive. But he CGAF about those idiots giving him money, nor for the USA.

 

[madmug]

Democrats: ThErE Is No FrAuD!!

GOP: So allow for a forensic audit and prove us wrong

Democrats: You don’t support democracy! Trust the vote!

GOP: So allow for a forensic audit and prove us wrong. If you have nothing to hide, why are you hiding?

Democrats: 您怎么敢质疑我们的权威!

...

I mean no.

Crap.

The courts decide if the vote is corrupted.

No one is hiding.

Except the Trumpites, from reality.

You lost. Go home.

 

[Roby]

So you were just trollilng - is that the best you've got?

Lebbo73 took it seriously. He gave it a like.

 

[Bont2Bruce]

bribery is at a completely insignificiant level. If corporates are caught bribing they end up in jail.

its legal political denotions for campaigning that is the overwhelming problem. And that is legal because politcians enable it to be. Major party campaign funding should be completely paid by tax payers.

This. The current "system" is just legalised corruption. Always strikes me as hypocritical when US or any other western democracy (e.g. ourselves) criticise China or some other openly "corrupt" regime for this very reason.

 

[Anzacpaul]

Cmon you can't be this naïve ?

" The various court filings were never meant to prevail. Their only purpose was to inform the pubic "

What level of chess is this ?

The level where going 1-59 in courts was "part of the plan".
Sidney Powell filing a garbage lawsuit full of spelling errors and mistakes was "part of the plan"
Hosting a press event at a landscaping place was "part of the plan".


How ******* deluded are these people? Like how "s**t for brains" dumb do you have to be to believe this s**t?

 

[Roby]

Lmao, you have no idea of how the scientific method works. Something being unproved does not necessarily make it false.