- Moderator
- #679
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Think they're the year after, and while we should plan to get them there is no guarantee they'll nominate us.
Think they're the year after, and while we should plan to get them there is no guarantee they'll nominate us.
Looks like a good kid. We could be a shot, depending on the mix we choose to draft.
Position? Forward/midfielder is his classification and can do both. More a hybrid mid than an inside type. Hard enough that that is not an issue. Some chance he could play wing, but probably not a classic type for that.
His best results were forward. Decent crumber and seems to get to the right areas, one of those he can “jump up” and take a grab for a relatively small player. I don’t see him as a first rounder, but said to be in the mix. Theoretically if we get Acres for the wing and choose to go tall for our first pick, he would be a really good option if he lasts to our second rounder. Offers a bit more variety to our forward mix and genuinely capable of playing midfield in time.
A bit from column A and some from Column B.Absolutely, but this is the thing with BF trade chat, it's all speculative. Maybe Sydney like next year's draft more, maybe not. Maybe they have some academy kids next year that would make late first rounders obsolete, or maybe they have a top 3 prospect who they need points for, or maybe they have some second round talents and would like to secure a few early draftees before matching bids in the second round. Maybe they love Busslinger and are prepared to cough up to get a pick in the top dozen, or maybe they love Brayden George and would rather take him at 17 or 18 themselves.
The s*t thing was Arrow taking a cheap shot over the "validity" of, in his words "so called trades". Disingenuous passive-aggressive s*t-stirring. His comeback? "Why would Sydney trade their 17 for their future first when next year's draft is better?" "They could get a better deal from another club". Firstly, every year is a better draft than the year before, and yet we always see trades for future picks. Secondly, draft strategy is a hell of a lot more complex than "which draft is better", especially for clubs with academies. Thirdly, who knows what those other clubs want to do, or who else they might trade with. Fourthly, it's ***** irrelevant, the trade suggestion was "thereabouts" and is worthy of discussion, not lazy derision.
I love trade chat. It's fun to consider all the permutations. It sucks when someone kicks the metaphorical ball over the fence for no good reason whatsoever. "I was asking for a valid trade scenario". Pfft, spare me, it was condescending crap thrown up in the face of valid trade scenarios because he thinks they're unlikely.
The other thing to bear in mind with 2023 draft, is that we will have one eye on the 2024 draft (with the Campo bros.) So next year, we might like to move our 2024 1st round to 2023 (to give us an extra pick in a good draft), and move later picks in 2023 to 2024 (for points). So throwing a pick this year back to 2023 isn't the worst idea - even if it leaves us with a poor hand this year.A bit from column A and some from Column B.
I understand some posters enjoy throwing up outlandish scenarios which sometimes make entertaining reading. They sometimes also read like a poorly written fiction novel.
Next year’s draft IS ABSOLUTELY superior to this years. If posters want crazy hypotheticals, find that option to split our picks or trade up to give us multiples in the first round. Brisbane will want points not picks, do we trade a couple of decent players and combine picks to get Brissie’s first? These are the more realistic prospects to look at. We will want our first next year, actually trading up for next year would be a better outcome than trying to push up this year.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Did you read the post you quoted?
At no stage did I say we would trade 2023 first for Sydney's Pick 17 & 18, as you suggested...
Never said you stated giving up a future 1st for 17 & 18
You stated pick 11 for 17 & 18 - Tell me, would you do that deal in our position and if not why would any other team do that deal, without something coming back with 11?
You also stated a future 1st for 17 or 18 - With next year's draft looking better that this year, why would we do that deal, to pick up a player that is solely a forward that has just done an ACL? I doubt we would entertain that move
Validity?
You tabled, you'd like to trade Pick 11 and pick 28 for Swans Pick 17 & 18, so your own post is not valid?
Problem is, at times posters here only read posts until they find something to bitch about... Try reading posters full posts...
This is a discussion forum after all, full of different ideas and discussion...
A lot different to a future 1st wouldn't you say?
Sure, you didn't...
Cadman plays very similar to Charlie, not Harry.Potential top-five pick Aaron Cadman has trained with Carlton's VFL side this week after the Greater Western Victoria Rebels' unexpected finish to their NAB League season last week.
![]()
Eagles hero, veteran Dog poised to stay, young Docker offered deal
Check out all the latest trade news from around the Leaguewww.afl.com.au
Posted this in the LM thread but thought I should copy it here too...
Key Forward - Height: 194cm, Weight: 88kg
View attachment 1495837
Twomey - Cadman's performances as a key forward are proving hard to ignore. The hard-working tall forward has been a prolific goalkicker all year – he booted seven goals in three games for Vic Country and 34 in the NAB League for the Rebels, including four two weeks ago against Gippsland Power. But Cadman is also capable of getting up the ground and being involved, with his goals that night coming alongside 20 disposals, seven marks and five inside 50s. Has some Harry McKay to the way he plays and has plenty of development left as well.
I'd take buss in heart beat we need more talented talls for long term approachMcAsey replaces Omac, think we still need one more KPP and if Buslinger was there at 11, I would take him
In turn, we could look at taking a tall later in the draft
We won't be getting two of them; I'd even look at taking Keeler with our first. Those draft rankings fluctuate so much, it's hard to take them seriously.While we have a want for quick mids and rebounding defenders, I would have zero issues if we wound up taking Busslinger and Keeler with our first two picks. Fantastic footballers.
Yup, Ben & Lucas Camporeale will be eligible in 2024 draft.Think they're the year after, and while we should plan to get them there is no guarantee they'll nominate us.
Yup and image Lions snap up Ashcroft & Fletcher to bolster their midfield.Plz Austin just find us a Zac Bailey if you can't get Tsatas
No chance at our p10, but agree Tsstars especially would be a dream come true.Tsatas or Humphrey please
You'd take Busslinger first but the rankings underrate Keeler; needs at the very least will dictate he gets picked up earlier than 29 as several sides will have a second pick before us.Fills two of our needs... KPF/Ruck and a KPD...
Then we could draft small forward or sliders with our remaining picks...
Doubt Keeler would last to pick 29 and (it would a another Curnow moment) if Busslinger lasted to pick 11
What we are in Dire need of is a Mid/Forward with elite disposal by foot. Our woeful delivery into the forward line is what cost our season.
We desperately need someone who can put the ball to the advantage of a leading forward, or pinpoint a free player in the middle of a zone.
You'd take Busslinger first but the rankings underrate Keeler; needs at the very least will dictate he gets picked up earlier than 29 as several sides will have a second pick before us.
Decent list of players. Like them and a handful of others with similar profiles. Overager Brandon Leary and Seth Campbell from Tassie, and Noah Long readily come to mind.George and Cahill have already been discussed here and would be good pick ups where ever they go...
Darcy Jones - Should still be available at pick 29- late second, was a goal kicking mid/forward at juniors and probably a small forward at AFL level because he is 175cm tall and tiny build wise... Has all the tools to be a player and would have been much higher up the draft order if he was taller...
Others I like, that would go very late in the draft to rookie picks are
Jack O’Sullivan - 4th round to rookie pick, watched this kid a bit in juniors for Kyneton... He has huge talent and probably a small forward at AFL level because he is also 175cm, invited to the combine so someone is interested...
Harvey Gallagher - 4th round to rookie pick, watched this kid a bit in juniors for Sandhurst... He talent, was a mid/forward at juniors and probably a small forward at AFL level because he is also 179cm, played 3 games for our reserves and invited to the combine so someone is interested...
Think they're the year after, and while we should plan to get them there is no guarantee they'll nominate us.
Easy for you to say. Who is he like?Really liking Mitch Szybkowski