- Moderator
- #679
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Must be watching different player, the footage I’ve seen his disposal by foot and both feet look pretty good to me
Every touch he got this gameFootage/highlights is different to a whole game
Every touch he got this game
Busslinger has better disposal for his heightWatch his other games
Had a great back half of his under-age year, but has been disappointing this year
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
So I watch his highlights/footage too and I thought his disposal was averageBusslinger has better disposal for his height
If we're looking for footskills and outside run you don't go for an inside mid that have elite hands and tidy disposal by foot. You go for the wingers who build their game on distributing by foot.
Only inside mids I'd be grabbing at 10 is Clark or Philippou because both can impact forward of centre too. Both aren't likely to reach us.
Hollands or Hotton for me, both fill a need.
They might not see a centre bounce at AFL level for 4 years with our current group. Would be a complete waste. Look at Sam Flanders at Gold Coast absolutely dominating 2's playing as a full time inside mid and then has little to no impact playing anywhere else when he's selected in the AFL team as theres too many mids ahead of him.If we decide to go a mid at pick 10...
I don't see an issue going an inside mid, if we think they are best available...
Always go best available...
We have to trade for Acres (unless Freo take a future), Owies must be upgraded. We must “lose” another main list player to take three picks, let alone four. (Might be done by shifting someone to the rookie list)
I've had that thought for best available for so long, but an inside mid is something I'd pass on with what we already have on our list.If we decide to go a mid at pick 10...
I don't see an issue going an inside mid, if we think they are best available...
Always go best available...
From my understanding, we won't be trading any future picks this year unless on draft night someone we really want falls and we trade a future for that current pick.The lack of news on Fog is interesting and I’m assuming we will trade Setters, even if we trade our second, I see us using a future to get back in to the draft. Time will tell.
Maybe it’s just me, but he reminded a little of Petracca/De Goey ... that burst out of the pack and pace/power
Love Cadman but how do we need him? We have two Coleman medallists who play in his position.Is it too much to ask for a miracle and Cadman slides to us.. from my limited viewing he's exactly what we need but looks exceedingly unlikely to make it outside the top 6 picks.
I do like Busslinger too but also likely to be gone by the time our pick rolls around.
I can't remember a draft where the first round has been so even and it's a struggle to decide who to go with. The old saying trade for needs and draft for talent- I stand by that. This year though unless there's a slider like the two mentioned above (or maybe even Clark), I think maybe you kill two birds with one stone and grab the needs based who happens to be best available as you could throw a blanket over about 10 guys with our pick. Maybe Phillipou as a guy who can play half forward with stints on-ball. I still think that's a weak area on our list.
I'd be a bit hesitant to draft a lightly framed outside type though. I think after bringing in Acres we need another year to assess our wings and the growth of LOB and Cottrell.
Hotton looks like hes got some real 'It' factor
Id be absolutely over the moon with Hollands and Hotton at 15-17 if we slid back for a 2nd bite.If there isn't a slider, Hotton is who I want
Id be absolutely over the moon with Hollands and Hotton at 15-17 if we slid back for a 2nd bite.
Because he would be very capable of playing as the third tall, which I still think is a weak area in our forward line. Or at the very least, allow Charlie to roam a bit higher. Love JSOS but he's not the answer long-term as our third tall. Also because I think he'll be the best player from the draft! McKay, Curnow, Cadman. Not a bad trio of talls. Though it's a moot point because it won't happen.Love Cadman but how do we need him? We have two Coleman medallists who play in his position.
It’s only a weakness because Jack has had to ruck. I want to see us focus on outside run and ball use whether it’s through draft or trade. I have no knowledge at all, just know that’s a weakness and I love hearing from Coona Blues Arr0w and the like to see who they are.Because he would be very capable of playing as the third tall, which I still think is a weak area in our forward line. Or at the very least, allow Charlie to roam a bit higher. Love JSOS but he's not the answer long-term as our third tall. Also because I think he'll be the best player from the draft! McKay, Curnow, Cadman. Not a bad trio of talls. Though it's a moot point because it won't happen.