Test Tickle
get stuffed
Me too, id love to get one in this week.Hewett vs Doch vs Sinclair vs Short. Need to get one in this week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Me too, id love to get one in this week.Hewett vs Doch vs Sinclair vs Short. Need to get one in this week.
You don't have Hewett???Hewett vs Doch vs Sinclair vs Short. Need to get one in this week.
I think you can throw a dart at any of them and it will be a good pickHewett vs Doch vs Sinclair vs Short. Need to get one in this week.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'd like this one too, but can we please add Jelly and WinesParish v Walsh v Merrett. Taking price into consideration. Could grab 1 of them next week also to complete my team. Atm I've traded Parish in.
I'd have the 3 im after ahead of the 2 you're after based on current prices.I'd like this one too, but can we please add Jelly and Wines
Sinclair.Sinclair v Cumming v Docherty
I think you can throw a dart at any of them and it will be a good pick
But, if I have to choose an order, it would be
Hewett > Sinclair > Short > Doch
Short would have been higher if he was still playing mainly in defense
I love Doch, but he got to be tiring soon - even after having a bye rest
Zerrett likely to be within 5 or so points of Parish/Walsh - he's pretty consistent 110s average player. I'd rather McCartin over Hobbs by a bit more than that so for me the first option.I'm not going to be able to upgrade my F6 to a premo for at least 4-5 weeks (probably Bailey Smith when he bottoms out around $500k), so:
Zerrett & McCartin (F6)
vs
Walsh/Parish & Hobbs (F6)
As it turns out, the combinations currently average the same (179).
It may not appear it on 1st look, but I wonder if the 1st combination is trending upwards more than the latter combo.
Yeah I've been weighing these two up as well. Hard to choose between them. Walsh is in some terrific form but Parish also had that unreal run last year.Parish vs Walsh
Finding it hard to split, I already have Cripps and Hewitt so I'd have half their midfield but I worry Parish would be put on ice before seasons out as I know he had foot issues earlier in year.
WalshParish vs Walsh
Finding it hard to split, I already have Cripps and Hewitt so I'd have half their midfield but I worry Parish would be put on ice before seasons out as I know he had foot issues earlier in year.
Think Parish will be the first to get tagged in that Essendon midfield as well. Walsh of course will get some attention but he has plenty of help in there. Essendon need to get some wins on the board with how much their fans and media are just coming down on them. Might throw around some pieces in the middle meaning Parish only gets 25-30 touches instead.Walsh
Playing in a finals team
He is going to be a better version of Macrae and the next supercoach god imo
Racks it up as a pig but does more damage
Parish is more Tom Mitchell
Scores accumulating with little damage
Will be consistent but I like Walsh’s upside in the run home more.
Not sure what Essendon will come out after the bye and with Langford/Stringer coming in, the midfield mix may change a tad.
Reckon it’ll be walsh 120+ parish 115ish from here. So both good picks but Walsh a little in front for me
The blues are fantasy pigs like the dogs of years gone byThink Parish will be the first to get tagged in that Essendon midfield as well. Walsh of course will get some attention but he has plenty of help in there. Essendon need to get some wins on the board with how much their fans and media are just coming down on them. Might throw around some pieces in the middle meaning Parish only gets 25-30 touches instead.
We want the ball in our hands. It’s hard to lose if you’re the one in control. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. But it always means plenty of supercoach points to go around. Walsh is a pig, he will average higher then Cripps and Hewett from here easily. The bloke could play full back and still pick up 30 disposals. Think people forget he’s only 21, he could easily go even higher. Will be a lock in that M1-6 for years to come.The blues are fantasy pigs like the dogs of years gone by
Hewett Cripps Walsh
Doing
Dunkley Bont Macrae numbers which is insane
It’s a very fantasy friendly style
Parish is the main man at Essendon but as you say they aren’t winning games which means a smaller piece of the pie. I like both picks but think Walsh is finally fit again and his ceiling is 125+ in the run home as the blues hunt a top 4 spot!
Yeah 110%We want the ball in our hands. It’s hard to lose if you’re the one in control. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. But it always means plenty of supercoach points to go around. Walsh is a pig, he will average higher then Cripps and Hewett from here easily. The bloke could play full back and still pick up 30 disposals. Think people forget he’s only 21, he could easily go even higher. Will be a lock in that M1-6 for years to come.
Hewett > Sinclair > Doc > ShortHewett vs Doch vs Sinclair vs Short. Need to get one in this week.
Last mid spot?
Have: Neale, Oliver, Macrae, Cripps, Miller, Kelly, Petracca and Cogs.
Cogs to
Laird vs Mills vs Parish vs Walsh
?
Which one is better?
Titch Walsh (plus a saved trade) vs Merrett Laird