- Sep 29, 2012
- 12,402
- 14,436
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Would Duursma get us a pick in the 20s straight up?
North.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Would Duursma get us a pick in the 20s straight up?
These numbers are not looking good.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Combine is a bit of a waste for us, only factor of interest might be speed.
We need smart footballers that might have some potential. If they have that speed that could be a bonus. However really we just need to draft a few small players that might make be Smokies, like a Dan Houston.PLAYERCARDSTART9Dan Houston
- Age
- 28
- Ht
- 186cm
- Wt
- 88kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 18.2
- 5star
- K
- 11.8
- 4star
- HB
- 6.4
- 4star
- M
- 4.9
- 5star
- T
- 3.0
- 5star
- MG
- 289.2
- 4star
- D
- 17.6
- 4star
- K
- 11.6
- 4star
- HB
- 6.0
- 3star
- M
- 3.3
- 3star
- T
- 3.4
- 4star
- MG
- 319.9
- 5star
- D
- 16.6
- 4star
- K
- 12.4
- 5star
- HB
- 4.2
- 4star
- M
- 7.0
- 5star
- T
- 2.6
- 4star
- MG
- 279.8
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
Definitely shouldn't be wasting draft picks on talls. If all our trades come off, our list will be way too stacked with talls. No more required this year that's for sure.
Yeah, nah.We currently have one ruck under contract.
No tall defenders that have proven themselves outside of Aliir.
Charlie is finished.
Lord only has a 1 year deal.
We don't want Marshall getting another concussion.
Mitch Georgiades recovering from an ACL.
Reid, Zane Zakostelsky and Vigo (all 2-3 years off playing)would be a pretty good draft haul[emoji848]
Yep, this is the sort of draft haul you'd expect we'd be targeting.would kill for a quick small forward or natural skilled forward
collard cothard or Moir. im as keen on munkara as anyone tho there would be a reason Essendon cut him. its an absolute must we look at this position.
an inside mid should be high on our radar
also wing if we like anyone there.
Yeah, nah.
Ruck:
You only need 3, and when you have them all in their prime window or in the very young space, there's definitely no need for another yet. We can expect at a minimum to have Sweet and Visentini as our rucks in 2024. Maybe Soldo will also end up here. If that happens, that is it. No more are needed. That'd be 3 ready to go rucks and 2 playing SANFL weekly. If we don't get Soldo it is likely Hayes or Lycett will get another year. There's a reason why neither have been 'delisted' yet.
As such, there's no value in looking at rucks. In that space right now we are looking comfortably covered.
Key Back:
We have a plethora of options.
Aliir, McKenzie, Burton, BZT, Ratagolea, Clurey, Pasini, Marshall & McCallum. In theory, if Aliir, BZT & Rata are first team, that leaves McKenzie, Clurey, Pasini as backup options, plus Burton who plays his best footy as a tall. That's solid depth already, with 2 project players also there. You don't go getting more project players, it is bad list management to do so. If we are that unhappy with the project players then McCallum would need to be delisted. Next year is the year with the loss of McKenzie that we should be looking at another project player, Marshall would be ready by then. Until then, if Clurey doesn't find a new home, which he probably wont on his contract, then we have him for 2 more years and he's well and truly good enough to remain as a break glass backup.
Key Fwd:
Never have we ever been so stocked.
Dixon, Marshall, Finlayson, Georgiades, Lord..... That's a heck of a lot of options that all need to be playing now. Dixon wont play 2025, so rather than rest on it, absolutely we need to be thinking about the next group, but in Marshall, Georgiades and Finlayson, they're already there. Not to mention Lord. Then we already have a very talented project player in Scully sitting underneath all of them. Of all the KPP areas, maybe this is the one that has the most potential for another project player, so maybe if there's one sitting there at the end of the draft they could fill a project spot.
What is blindingly obvious from all this is that really with the expected trading, we are covered for tall options, there's really no need for anymore. We head into this draft with a desperate need to stock up on speedy players that could fill gaps on a wing or up forward, or just added midfield depth options. We certainly need that much more than the talls. So our draft strategy should be 100% simple. Draft the best kids with the most potential, some natural footballers, or some guys with some sort of X factor speed that should come off. There's definitely no need to target KPPs. In fact it'd be real poor list management if we drafted more than 1 max.
You aint fixing our KP problems in one off season with pick 86 and 104. You're talking project players and we already have Marshall & McCallum. If we don't think they will ever make it then you delist them before you get more. Marshall to me looks good, McCallum I'd be happy to drop.Our current options in defence are killing us.
We can't delist those under contract.
My point really was we have a serious weakness in defence and a decent long term option being available in the draft would be hard to go past particularly as all of the quality mids are gone.
Might be the first time in sports history that a professional club has gone all in on depth players.![]()
Incoming 10 page post from Janus about how we've moneyballed our way to the top, Hinkley is a master coach and we're set to take the world by storm.Might be the first time in sports history that a professional club has gone all in on depth players.
Not sure if they're classed as professional, but the Redbacks do it pretty much every year.Might be the first time in sports history that a professional club has gone all in on depth players.