- Joined
- Dec 29, 2003
- Posts
- 28,636
- Reaction score
- 14,287
- Location
- Beverly Hills 90210 Antifa bracket
- AFL Club
- Richmond
rowboatsLongstaff went to Cambridge I think , not Oxford.
Oxxxbridge
boatrace
head of river public schoolboys Wilde with an e
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

rowboatsLongstaff went to Cambridge I think , not Oxford.
yo ST, are we complicit cos we cheered? I put my hand up, I loved how Starc displaced poles Linda Lovelace style. Well, he displaced the wicket and stump poles.Starc can’t get the reverse swing going anymore ,I wonder what has changed, anyone who believes the bowlers didn’t know, is stupid, the “cheating” has been going on for some time,it’s just that they got caught with sandpaper, has anyone checked the sticking plaster on Warner’s hands?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Starc can’t get the reverse swing going anymore ,I wonder what has changed, anyone who believes the bowlers didn’t know, is stupid, the “cheating” has been going on for some time,it’s just that they got caught with sandpaper, has anyone checked the sticking plaster on Warner’s hands?
It was clear something was up against England a year ago. They were consistently reversing it from 25-30 overs, while they managed it inside 10 overs against the Saffas - that's unheard of. Maybe they somehow smuggled their own ball on the field or something, or found some concrete to "accidentally" rough it up with, or "accidentally" dropped a water bottle on one side, soaking the ball.Starc can’t get the reverse swing going anymore ,I wonder what has changed, anyone who believes the bowlers didn’t know, is stupid, the “cheating” has been going on for some time, it’s just that they got caught with sandpaper, has anyone checked the sticking plaster on Warner’s hands?
if they all knew are not they all equally complicit, or does DW deserve disproportionate share? lawfacultyphilosophy101 i 'spose.You can guarantee that whatever was going on with the ball, David Warner was at the centre of it and Steve Smith knew. The old adage goes "it isn't cheating if you don't get caught".
it is a piece of shit innitHaving actually watched the ad on TV now
For nearly 1 million views, it has almost 1/3rd the number of downvotes as it does upvotes, and it doesn't have many upvotes. As tasteless as an ad gets, right up there with most ill-conceived ads of 2018, certainly one of the most ill-considered.it is a piece of shit innit
one has to blame Richmond and their premiership year and their stupid Mens Sheds talking about their feelings and all this bullshit, Brandon Ellis et al, and Danny Frawley's SEN show Never Let a Man Walk Home Alone or some shite. He is a smart guy Danny Frawley, if you are comparing IQs of used prophylactics to a person.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkC46v_0nb0
There's certainly orchestrated scapegoating going on, as if the players are singing from the same sheet. It's kind of hip to hate on Warner though, he's been such a divisive figure in Australian cricket for so long, his personality grating and his actions deplorable, that it was inevitable.if they all knew are not they all equally complicit, or does DW deserve disproportionate share? lawfacultyphilosophy101 i 'spose.
This prompts me to recall the Simon Doull interview on SEN's The Sporting Capital that Jack Heverin hosted, when Doull said he thought the Australians would not leave a few to hang out to dry to carry the can for all, to mix those two metaphors or euphemisms. He said the thought the Aussies were better. Guess what SD, we ain't, we are human like the rest.
It is very unseemly to hate on DW /grammar. The media piled on, the people piled on, the true unseemly trope or phenomenon of this affair is how we have all been complicit on one player, albeit a bit of a pundenda* the person, but the person and the player should be mutually exclusive no? Otherwise we would not cheer on when said c_nut has scored a ton in the first session of the Boxing Day match and we are downing pint after pint in the Bullring. A modern day d'affaire Dreyfus in an Australian lens where being a sportsman, a 'good guy', and a sorry mate server is the apotheosis of one's aspirational achievement.
*pudenda qualifier as before. i use the plural when talking/writing in the singular. skilts gave me permission.
you mean, Huey Lewis & The News and other recondite and esoteric references?It's kind of hip to hate on Warner though, he's been such a divisive figure in Australian cricket for so long, his personality grating and his actions deplorable, that it was inevitable.
eyou mean, Huey Lewis & The News and other recondite and esoteric references?
irony* is, the irony in this case is, DW was changing his ways when Boof (I love Antepodean nicks) when Boof Lehman gave him the specific brief to be the psychological tormenter, the spearhead, Tugga Waugh's mental disintegration strategy101 manifest... he was not being such a prick. He had changed, or was in the midst of changing... then Boof gives him the brief. Like the BS about Bancroft being headbutted by Jonny Bairstow. That was Lehman and DW trying to get too smart and play mindgames with the poms, they set up Bancroft to wield a fable. I am sure Bairstow clumsily collected heads, but more like the Innuit's use their noses to kiss. This was not a violent act. It was not the Liverpool kiss, or Glasgow kiss, it was more Innuit with a nose.
*most people use the term when a far more felicitous term to use would be coincidence, but La pussie noir got this right, eh meds? medusala
if they all knew are not they all equally complicit, or does DW deserve disproportionate share? .
He said the money earned from the commercial will be going straight towards the mental health foundation he and Gus Worland have been working with during his time off. Wow, what a monster The Swans Blog.
His minders told him he didn’t sound credible first timeAnother Steve Smith interview. Omfg. **** off already?
Edit: no blaming Warner this time
too harsh on the Vodafone Mens Sheds thingHis minders told him he didn’t sound credible first time
His minders told him he didn’t sound credible first time
you mean, Huey Lewis & The News and other recondite and esoteric references?
irony* is, the irony in this case is, DW was changing his ways when Boof (I love Antipodean nicks) when Boof Lehman gave him the specific brief to be the psychological tormenter, the spearhead, Tugga Waugh's mental disintegration strategy101 manifest... he was not being such a prick. He had changed, or was in the midst of changing... then Boof gives him the brief. Like the BS about Bancroft being headbutted by Jonny Bairstow. That was Lehman and DW trying to get too smart and play mindgames with the poms, they set up Bancroft to wield a fable, hence the pressa where Smith was giggling like a private school primaryschool schoolboy. I am sure Bairstow clumsily collected heads, but more like the Inuit's use their noses to kiss. This was not a violent act. It was not the Liverpool kiss, or Glasgow kiss, it was more Inuit with a nose.
*most people use the term when a far more felicitous term to use would be coincidence, but La pussie noir got this right, eh meds? medusala
edit: Inuit only has a single n, ask Tom Danielson who had t n's but was one sixth, or 15% innuit[sic] so said Jonathan Vaughters yaco55 #schoolboys
#Wilde
he is just using DW's credits on the slot machine. DW's machine was tilting, with or without the l. So he said Smithie, take my coins, you can have the credit.He's of the Hamish "rompingwins" mould.
Nobody will take him seriously.
nah, just some shallow hand-wringing. introspection without introspection. Really is quite brilliant. wear the badge of the SJWYeah we all get that yawn.............
I think what's happened is this whole episode has opened up the cracks in Australian society which the cricket team is a reflection of.
nah, just some shallow hand-wringing. introspection without introspection. Really is quite brilliant. wear the badge of the SJW
so it is your position (serious question, serious matter), so your position without me putting words in your mouth, that the fourth Estate was mining this embroglio for all the attention they could garner (praps because they needed the eyeballs as Ad revenues haemmorhaging) and this was a media-driven storm in a teacup just like the BS that 4thestat'ers and Deepstaters are pushing wrt Trump-Russia.Yeah Nah.........The shallow hand wringing was done and dusted 15 yrs a go. No one give a flying **** anymore (Circa Warne to Kryious...if you want your technacalitieis)
so it is your position (serious question, serious matter), so your position without me putting words in your mouth, that the fourth Estate was mining this embroglio for all the attention they could garner
My only paradox there, is ABC are pushing both hard (stronger than any other media outfit) and they are on the government's teet. I 'spose they need the eyeballs to justify the budget and they are competing for eyeballs across all media disciplines