A 100 goal season & Joe Daniher: is he overwhelmingly the most capable player of achieving it again?

[boncer34]

Injury trolling. Nice.

 

[Xtreme]

Wingard is more likely to snag 100 goals in a footy season (especially now he's at the MIGHTY HAWKS!!).

 

[Snake_Baker]

I doubt he'll ever kick 50, as I see him playing as a true CHF.

 

[threesixpio]

Wingard is more likely to snag 100 goals in a footy season (especially now he's at the MIGHTY HAWKS!!).

Who will kick more? I might place a bet

 

[Xtreme]

Who will kick more? I might place a bet

Wingard will kick 118
Daniher will be luck to kick 28

 

[juss]

If any season is the season it’s this one you’d say

Why so?

 

[threesixpio]

Why so?

He will have better delivery from an improved midfield

 

[iBeng]

No.

 

[perplexed]

Last year Essendon won 28% of the games he played and 67% of the games he missed. Over his career, the figures are 37% and 65%.
I appreciate that these figured are exagerated by Essendon's unique approach to player welfare. But, has there ever been a player who has had such a damaging effect on his club's performance?

 

[rumply]

Last year Essendon won 28% of the games he played and 67% of the games he missed. Over his career, the figures are 37% and 65%.
I appreciate that these figured are exagerated by Essendon's unique approach to player welfare. But, has there ever been a player who has had such a damaging effect on his club's performance?

obtuse is as obtuse does

 

[Jade]

Last year Essendon won 28% of the games he played and 67% of the games he missed. Over his career, the figures are 37% and 65%.
I appreciate that these figured are exagerated by Essendon's unique approach to player welfare. But, has there ever been a player who has had such a damaging effect on his club's performance?

Correlation =/= Causation.

A very dull, unintelligent attempted troll.

 

[Procrastinator35]

Last year Essendon won 28% of the games he played and 67% of the games he missed. Over his career, the figures are 37% and 65%.
I appreciate that these figured are exagerated by Essendon's unique approach to player welfare. But, has there ever been a player who has had such a damaging effect on his club's performance?

WoW....Positively Damning stats those.

 

[perplexed]

Correlation =/= Causation.

A very dull, unintelligent attempted troll.

Would you care to explain the numbers?

 

[threesixpio]

Daniher - first to kick goals in 100 sequential loses?

 

[threesixpio]

Correlation =/= Causation.

A very dull, unintelligent attempted troll.

The numbers don’t lie. An alternative cause should be suggested given the very strong correlation I would have thought. It certainly can form the basis of a strong hypothesis that Daniher is damaging the team’s performance

PS: There was an argument to say Hawthorn did better without Buddy which doesn’t mean Buddy is s**t - it might mean that the team is too reliant on him when he is around. If anything it’s a weird compliment to Daniher.

Supporters gushing over him possibly kicking 100 doesn’t help this. I blame them

 

[Procrastinator35]

Put it all down to that sad excuse, of a try-hard 70's pr0n-star tash.

 

[Jade]

Would you care to explain the numbers?

Why? Do they need explaining?

He was as useless as **** on a bull in 2013-14, Essendon collapsed in 2015 under the weight of the saga, 2016 players were suspended, 2017 he did very well and the club improved, 2018 he was injured all year.

But you're the one making the claim, if you can't overcome the correlation/causation issue, your claim is therefore bullshit dribble spewed by a clown trying to troll.

 

[threesixpio]

Why? Do they need explaining?

He was as useless as **** on a bull in 2013-14, Essendon collapsed in 2015 under the weight of the saga, 2016 players were suspended, 2017 he did very well and the club improved, 2018 he was injured all year.

But you're the one making the claim, if you can't overcome the correlation/causation issue, your claim is therefore bullshit dribble spewed by a clown trying to troll.

He’s useless, team doping and a little bit of injury?

 

[Procrastinator35]

Why? Do they need explaining?

He was as useless as **** on a bull in 2013-14, Essendon collapsed in 2015 under the weight of the saga, 2016 players were suspended, 2017 he did very well and the club improved, 2018 he was injured all year.

But you're the one making the claim, if you can't overcome the correlation/causation issue, your claim is therefore bullshit dribble spewed by a clown trying to troll.

Not great grammar here, it must be said.

Composure all lost at sea.

Lets be honest here....The lad has the potential to be a very good ordinary player, were he to apply himself fully.

 

[Jade]

Not great grammar here, it must be said.

Composure all lost at sea.

Lets be honest here....The lad has the potential to be a very good ordinary player, were he to apply himself fully.

The lad would have more value at the trade table than any Hawthorn player - including your Brownlow medallist.

 

[perplexed]

The lad would have more value at the trade table than any Hawthorn player - including your Brownlow medallist.

Let's just see if he can have a year where he benefits his team more than its marketing department before we start trade negotiations.

 

[Jade]

Let's just see if he can have a year where he benefits his team more than its marketing department before we start trade negotiations.

BigFooty.

Where people pass off their hopes and dreams as fact.

 

[perplexed]

View attachment 601313

BigFooty.

Where people pass off their hopes and dreams as fact.

He could at least have showered.

 

[Procrastinator35]

The lad would have more value at the trade table.

Steady on there old chap....Sure, the lad has been struggling of late, well, probably most of his career truth be told.... But surely trade-talk at this stage is premature.

One more year of average Joe should see you land a late 3rd & enable you to cut your losses.

 

[Jade]

He could at least have showered.

And lose that manly musk?