How can you be holding the ball when both your hands are in the air, and neither has the ball?Or I understand the rules.
Had Greenwood even tried to dispose of the footy instead of just throwing his hands up then it would have been a ball up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How can you be holding the ball when both your hands are in the air, and neither has the ball?Or I understand the rules.
Had Greenwood even tried to dispose of the footy instead of just throwing his hands up then it would have been a ball up.
He can't get rid of it if it's being held to him.Yes but he dived on the footy and didn't try to dispose of it, he just let it be held to him after diving on it and not try to dispose of it.
He has to make an attempt to get rid of it and he didn't.
what about when taylor adams was kicking and some bloke shoved him as hard as he could in the spine. about a dozen bad calls where made in the last and dees got lucky with about 10 of them.So 1 decision in the whole game? I saw a blatant htb against Howe not paid, what's the difference?
A bad tradesman blames his toolsThe ball was being held to him, bullshit decision. It's that sort of decision that frustrates fans.
Great game and great finish.
Good to see the Dees win it for Neale and for my tipping.
When was it, 1964?You won a H&A game in Round 12 mate, relax.
It's no wonder you guys have no concept of success if you're celebrating/trolling.
Glad this is what entertains you after your side has won a game of footy. I guess we're different.
Yeah, no. It all adds up in the end. We certainly lost the plot, but bad decision making makes a difference.A bad tradesman blames his tools
A bad team blames the tools umpiring the game.
Not Melbourne. I'm not sure how anyone could interpret as wrong what he said.So Taylor, that's what a successful team look like huh?
How can you be holding the ball when both your hands are in the air, and neither has the ball?
He can't get rid of it if it's being held to him.
Not Melbourne. I'm not sure how anyone could interpret as wrong what he said.
Had a look at the ladder and despite our obvious shitness Bucks is below old Freo
You keep saying he had to get rid of the footy, he didnt have it!Let's break it down for you.
1) Dove on ball.
2) Had arms free
3) Did not make an attempt to dispose of the footy but instead just let it be held to him
All he had to do was make it look like he was trying to get rid of the footy but he didn't even try.
He can't get rid of it if it's being held to him.
A worse kick of the ball you will not find.I think Collingwood missed Taylor Adams. His precise kicking would have been an asset today.
The guy should learn the definition of success before before potting others.
You're on social media trolling randoms, I wouldn't imagine it's too exciting.Yeah, we're completely different, my life doesn't completely revolve around footy
If you watched Adams play, you would know he can't kick for s**t. Actually learn what type of player he is before talking s**tI think Collingwood missed Taylor Adams. His precise kicking would have been an asset today.
The guy should learn the definition of success before before potting others.
Is 'dove' a word?Let's break it down for you.
1) Dove on ball.
2) Had arms free
3) Did not make an attempt to dispose of the footy but instead just let it be held to him
All he had to do was make it look like he was trying to get rid of the footy but he didn't even try.
You're on social media trolling randoms, I wouldn't imagine it's too exciting.
It's a bird, probably should have been "He dived on the ball".Is 'dove' a word?
So Taylor, that's what a successful team look like huh?