- Oct 9, 2003
- 45,029
- 42,844
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Eagles (NFL), Suns (NBA)
They did that in the 76 GFHawthorn avenge the 1975 GF loss!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They did that in the 76 GFHawthorn avenge the 1975 GF loss!
PointThey did that in the 76 GF
And just to make sure the 78 GFThey did that in the 76 GF
Looks quite possibletogether with yours and my teams
This was a practice game between two bottom 4 teams. I'm pretty sure a top 4 sides second 22 could have been competitive. I wouldn't read too much into it.Hawthorn have no youth!
Koschitzke, Brockman and Jiath...
“Hold our beers”
Obviously havent got too much to be excited about down at Arden street. Who knows, maybe they’ll get a new bricked toilet block soon and we’ll see a post about thatBig frigging deal, he sold a dummy. Every half-decent player has that in their locker. Come back when Simpkin has two Norm Smiths and four flags.
See ya.
when coaches throw all 18 players behind the ball so there is no room left to find a teammate then yes, a rule is needed. In fact more than 1
This was a practice game between two bottom 4 teams. I'm pretty sure a top 4 sides second 22 could have been competitive. I wouldn't read too much into it.
cant think of many team ball sports where there are no rules to dictate where players can move. We now see 36 players within 70m of the ball. It was never intended to be that way and is basically unwatchable when it occursNope, more creative coaching is needed to counteract it.
The AFL meddles with the game far too much. I cannot think of another sport where the rules are changed as often as ours.
Not even close.
You can't be chirpy about that win. You defeated the team who finished equal bottom last year, and are widely tipped to finish the same this year.Hawthorn have no youth!
Koschitzke, Brockman and Jiath...
“Hold our beers”
I was there when we ended your finals runs in 94, 2000 and 2007. That's good enough for me.And just to make sure the 78 GF
Yesterday’s result says more about North than it does the Hawks, but we found a few players and we’ll have upwards of 6 inclusions for Round 1.You can't be chirpy about that win. You defeated the team who finished equal bottom last year, and are widely tipped to finish the same this year.
You should only be celebrating because you dodged a bullet by not losing to the team who finished equal bottom last year, and are widely tipped to finish the same this year. Which is hardly worth celebrating.
Or coaches could recruit players who can kick over the congestion.when coaches throw all 18 players behind the ball so there is no room left to find a teammate then yes, a rule is needed. In fact more than 1
You can't be chirpy about that win. You defeated the team who finished equal bottom last year, and are widely tipped to finish the same this year.
You should only be celebrating because you dodged a bullet by not losing to the team who finished equal bottom last year, and are widely tipped to finish the same this year. Which is hardly worth celebrating.
There's no garuanee of course, but it's a decent chance. Bombers, Crows, Swans, Hawks, North Melbourne are probably the bottom 5 teams for mine, the order is a bit of a lottery at this point.There’s no guarantee that Hawthorn will finish bottom four this year, especially if there’s going to be games played at the MCG. If Hawthorn did finish bottom four, then they will have 3 picks inside the top 30 in the draft thanks to Collingwood trading their second round pick. lol
You can't be chirpy about that win. You defeated the team who finished equal bottom last year, and are widely tipped to finish the same this year.
You should only be celebrating because you dodged a bullet by not losing to the team who finished equal bottom last year, and are widely tipped to finish the same this year. Which is hardly worth celebrating.
They would wanna be competitive since it was Hawthorn second 22 with Sicily, Gunston, Mitchell, Wingard, O'Meara, Breust, Scrimshaw, Lewis missing from out best 22, could even add Scully for 9 of the best 22 missing.This was a practice game between two bottom 4 teams. I'm pretty sure a top 4 sides second 22 could have been competitive. I wouldn't read too much into it.