Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
http://www.quora.com/If-the-nuclear...ould-it-affect-the-environment/answers/437321If the nuclear plant damaged by the Japan earthquake melts down, how would it affect the environment?
What would be the effects in the local region and other places in the Pacific, including the West Coast of the United States?
*Edited Question according to Andy Lemke's suggestion.
Andy Lemke, I've actually handled nuclear fuel
I've actually handled nuclear fuel Nuclear Power
2 votes by Kaicheng Liang and Shane Kittelson
First, a bit of terminology: a nuclear reactor does not 'blow up'. Like a 3 year old child, it will have "a melt down".
I highly highly doubt this will happen with recent events, but to put things in perspective, the Chernobyl disaster spread radiation over most of Eastern Europe (including all of Germany and some of Italy). Also, with regard to radiation being spread - it is highly dependent on wind patterns over the area. I'm not sure how the plume would be carried by wind currents.
The reactor in Japan could not possibly have this type of effect because of the far superior design - a containment system which is used in the GE design and the many redundant controls which are in place. The reactors in Japan are at least an entire design generation more advanced than the Chernobyl type.
Typing "what will happen to japen if the plant thing blows up" into Google and the first result is:
http://www.quora.com/If-the-nuclear...ould-it-affect-the-environment/answers/437321
Blankets reduce airflow across your skin, reducing the amount of heat that is taken away by this process. Body hair works in a similar fashion. The air stays relatively still, so it's just warmed by your body and then sits there, keeping you warm in turn (instead of buggering off into the atmosphere).
St. Paul was a Roman citizen by birth, I believe.
Che Guevara was a Communist revolutionary. Of course, the nature of being a revolutionary meant he killed a lot of people, but as is the tendency of everyone, on any side of politics, icons are either romanticised or demonised. Guevara falls into the former category.
Which country, how did he die etc
Peter...
That being the case, no idea.Blankets reduce airflow across your skin, reducing the amount of heat that is taken away by this process. Body hair works in a similar fashion. The air stays relatively still, so it's just warmed by your body and then sits there, keeping you warm in turn (instead of buggering off into the atmosphere).
Lol, my bad. I've been misreading things all day.That being the case, no idea.
Which country, how did he die etc
Probably a good thing they killed him then. I've never understood why people deify him.He is revered for his perceived moral motivations in trying to overthrow capitalism and create communist systems that assisted the less fortunate.
Probably a good thing they killed him then. I've never understood why people deify him.
he was argentinian.Che was Cuban. Killed mostly Bolivians.
You realise this in no way matches what you quoted, right?


2. How did st peter end up in rome? (not sure if he did tbh)