- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
- Posts
- 32,276
- Reaction score
- 56,235
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Kidding, right?
Bolt chums are just as bad:
Considering “Cultural Marxism” doesn’t even exist, yeah, that’s pretty dumb.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 13
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Bolt chums are just as bad:
Too busy writing his next "Pell is innocent" piece?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I was saying to my partner this morning, Bolt, Credlin, Abbott, Dutton etc would have been all over this if if had been a Muslim gunman,When other overseas terrorist attacks have happened, his articles were up so quickly it’s almost like they were pre-written.
Unless I’m mistaken, nothing here.
Bolt’s silence over the past 24 hours is deafening.
Of course, he’s dismayed that the massacre is being used by others to “label debate as hate speech” and have it shut down.
Dolt’s only ever had one idea. “Hey, if I bang on and on about free speech, eventually I can say anything.”What do you know, he’s stuck his head up.
Of course, he’s dismayed that the massacre is being used by others to “label debate as hate speech” and have it shut down.
Dolt’s only ever had one idea. “Hey, if I bang on and on about free speech, eventually I can say anything.”
One is supposed to have bias as a politician.Hit the wrong button and just finished watching Bolt v DiNatale.
Well shit, wasn't that instructive!
Two dickheads trying to scream over each other, denying each others prejudices, dog whistling each other more than the biggest shearing shed in the world.
And the divide continues.
And most people don't even realise it.
Bolt chums are just as bad:
One is supposed to have bias as a politician.
Not so much if you want to be a fact based journalist
And if your media role is just loud opinions but not even elected then you can be dismissed as irrelevant no better than those of us posting opinions on bigfooty.
Bolt is an irrelevance who luckboxed his way into a high paying gig.
It wasn't "luckboxed". It was quite calculated.
Ironically it was the ABC who gave Blots career as a pseudo journalist momentum - thanks ABC. I recall him bemoaning there being insufficient right wing comment in the media during his weekly right wing warped tirades. As an opportunist he saw there were enough right wing dingbats out there to make a career as a purveyor of lies, distortions, personal vitriol and generally inflammatory language. He was right.
When one gets found guilty in a court of law for such things as your hero has, be sure and get back to usOr enough left wing dingbats out there to make a career exposing their lies, distortions, personal vitriol and generally inflammatory language.
When one gets found guilty in a court of law for such things as your hero has, be sure and get back to us
What was Bolt 'found guilty of in a court of law'?
I have not been satisfied that the offensive conduct that I have found occurred, is exempted from unlawfulness by section 18D. The reasons for that conclusion have to do with the manner in which the articles were written, including that they contained errors of fact, distortions of the truth and inflammatory and provocative language.
Your apparent compulsion to take cheap shots doesn't appear to include familiarising yourself with the matters under discussion.
But hey, that's in keeping with the way Bolt operates so you have a lot in common.
Eastock v Bolt