Bomber in trouble

[Jack-Packenham]

How long will the cats fans stick strong behind bomber ???

If he continues to play Gardiner and Slade (which is as good as being 2 men short) the fans will turn in the next couple of weeks.

 

[thehoff]

How long will the cats fans stick strong behind bomber ???

If he continues to play Gardiner and Slade (which is as good as being 2 men short) the fans will turn in the next couple of weeks.

For once, i agree with you Jack.

I have loved Bomber forever but i am slowly getting frustrated with his game plan and his continued faith in players such as Gardiner, Slade and even Kelly.

I don't understand why he will drop a player (S.Johnson) and continue with Charlie Gardiner. The guy is seriously one of the worst footballers i have ever seen in the Geelong colours (Just behind Mark Jackson).

I have a feeling, that if you went into the Coaches office, there would be a guy named Charlie under his desk providing reasons for his selection...

 

[The Hulkster]

Please see my thread i have bought back from about 4 weeks ago. It makes more sense now.

 

[Goldust]

How long will the cats fans stick strong behind bomber ???

If he continues to play Gardiner and Slade (which is as good as being 2 men short) the fans will turn in the next couple of weeks.

And Playfair too!!!!

Three men short I think the Cats!!!

 

[Jack-Packenham]

And Playfair too!!!!

Three men short I think the Cats!!!

Being a tigers fan you would know all about coaches being under the pump.

Reading the HS on saturday you would have thought that Playfair was great saying how bomber was a big fan of him and that was justified by his mark and goal in the first quarter. The only problem was he had only 1 more kick and that missed the target by 25 metres.

 

[Goldust]

Being a tigers fan you would know all about coaches being under the pump.

Reading the HS on saturday you would have thought that Playfair was great saying how bomber was a big fan of him and that was justified by his mark and goal in the first quarter. The only problem was he had only 1 more kick and that missed the target by 25 metres.

WILL trade for him! We give you Pattison, we take Playfair! And we'll throw in a little something extra, like a set of steak knives.

 

[Sammy D]

Being a tigers fan you would know all about coaches being under the pump.

Reading the HS on saturday you would have thought that Playfair was great saying how bomber was a big fan of him and that was justified by his mark and goal in the first quarter. The only problem was he had only 1 more kick and that missed the target by 25 metres.

Because it was fantastic conditions for tall forwards.

 

[Ricketts]

Kent and Playfair will be better for the run, and back in the Dome for good conditions next week, expect them to dominate. Cats by 25.

 

[Kent_Kingsley]

i admire your optimism ricketts.

Yes Slade and Gardiner should be axed...and the fact Slade was even retained for the Melbourne game bordered on disgraceful. But Bomber is a good coach...and i have complete faith in him.

my opinions would change somewhat if we failed to make the 8 however

 

[TheTimeCometh]

How long will the cats fans stick strong behind bomber ???

If he continues to play Gardiner and Slade (which is as good as being 2 men short) the fans will turn in the next couple of weeks.

i admire your optimism ricketts.

Yes Slade and Gardiner should be axed...and the fact Slade was even retained for the Melbourne game bordered on disgraceful. But Bomber is a good coach...and i have complete faith in him.

my opinions would change somewhat if we failed to make the 8 however

Today 12:35

Ricketts
Kent and Playfair will be better for the run, and back in the Dome for good conditions next week, expect them to dominate. Cats by 25.

Today 11:12

Sammy D

Quote:



Originally Posted by Jack-Packenham

Being a tigers fan you would know all about coaches being under the pump.

Reading the HS on saturday you would have thought that Playfair was great saying how bomber was a big fan of him and that was justified by his mark and goal in the first quarter. The only problem was he had only 1 more kick and that missed the target by 25 metres.



Because it was fantastic conditions for tall forwards.

Today 09:58

Goldust

Quote:



Originally Posted by Jack-Packenham

Being a tigers fan you would know all about coaches being under the pump.

Reading the HS on saturday you would have thought that Playfair was great saying how bomber was a big fan of him and that was justified by his mark and goal in the first quarter. The only problem was he had only 1 more kick and that missed the target by 25 metres.



WILL trade for him! We give you Pattison, we take Playfair! And we'll throw in a little something extra, like a set of steak knives.

Today 09:21

Jack-Packenham

Quote:



Originally Posted by Goldust

And Playfair too!!!!

Three men short I think the Cats!!!




Being a tigers fan you would know all about coaches being under the pump.

Reading the HS on saturday you would have thought that Playfair was great saying how bomber was a big fan of him and that was justified by his mark and goal in the first quarter. The only problem was he had only 1 more kick and that missed the target by 25 metres.

Today 09:09

Goldust

Quote:



Originally Posted by Jack-Packenham

How long will the cats fans stick strong behind bomber ???

If he continues to play Gardiner and Slade (which is as good as being 2 men short) the fans will turn in the next couple of weeks.




And Playfair too!!!!

Three men short I think the Cats!!!


Today 08:44

The Hulkster
Please see my thread i have bought back from about 4 weeks ago. It makes more sense now.

Today 08:40

thehoff

Quote:



Originally Posted by Jack-Packenham

How long will the cats fans stick strong behind bomber ???

If he continues to play Gardiner and Slade (which is as good as being 2 men short) the fans will turn in the next couple of weeks.



For once, i agree with you Jack.

I have loved Bomber forever but i am slowly getting frustrated with his game plan and his continued faith in players such as Gardiner, Slade and even Kelly.

I don't understand why he will drop a player (S.Johnson) and continue with Charlie Gardiner. The guy is seriously one of the worst footballers i have ever seen in the Geelong colours (Just behind Mark Jackson).

I have a feeling, that if you went into the Coaches office, there would be a guy named Charlie under his desk providing reasons for his selection...

Today 08:22

Jack-Packenham
How long will the cats fans stick strong behind bomber ???

If he continues to play Gardiner and Slade (which is as good as being 2 men short) the fans will turn in the next couple of weeks.

surely we can still find 9w from 16?

 

[TheTimeCometh]

sorry bout the quotes!

oh-oh! spaghetti-o's!~!!

 

[Partridge]

i admire your optimism ricketts.

Yes Slade and Gardiner should be axed...and the fact Slade was even retained for the Melbourne game bordered on disgraceful. But Bomber is a good coach...and i have complete faith in him.

my opinions would change somewhat if we failed to make the 8 however

I don't. His coaching of the Footscray game was ludicrous. We've lost the last 4, that's enough to change my opinion. We were something like 7-2 early last season correct? So since then what exactly is our win-loss record? I imagine it's not too flattering.