- Banned
- #676
Would love a home ground advantage for the GF.
s**t even a final at our home ground would be nice, let alone the Grand Final.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would love a home ground advantage for the GF.
s**t even a final at our home ground would be nice, let alone the Grand Final.
We're just thrilled because we win flags under the same rules as most other clubs. Sydney should try it.
Would love a home ground advantage for the GF.
No you didn't.
No. Beating Collingwood and Hawthorn on the way to 2012 premiership glory was what cost Sydney the allowance. 1 Premiership was enough to cause a Victorian meltdown.
Yes, that's what it was.
And only rivaled by the meltdown about Brisbane early last decade and the Barassi call for an inquiry into the interstate dominance.
And what's your thoughts on the meltdown going on around the Hawks doing a three peat at a time when equalisation is supposedly in play
We will see if the AFL change any rules or ban them from trading.
Can we at least be given an extra million to play with first?
Meanwhile I hear there's a rule about rushing behinds.....
And only rivaled by the meltdown about Brisbane early last decade and the Barassi call for an inquiry into the interstate dominance.
We will see if the AFL change any rules or ban them from trading.
Oh please, the Hawks are kings of the rule changes and changes in interpretation. I love how you guys think it's winning a premiership that got you banned from trading when everyone knows it's because you pissed Fitzpatrick off with the Buddy deal.
As for the MCG advantage - there is nothing the Hawks can do about that - it's within the rules
As for the MCG advantage - there is nothing the Hawks can do about that - it's within the rules
Utter revisionism.
including paying him nearly half a million in COLA,
Oh please, the Hawks are kings of the rule changes and changes in interpretation.
Wasn't it the potential Ryder deal that tipped then over the edge?
There have been many rule changes over the previous 10-15 years and some have been due to Hawthorn. Others, such as the quick kick in from a behind were due to other teams.
Who knows - it was petty and disgraceful whatever it was but it was certainly nothing to do with winning a premiership like has been implied
And?? - you said "We will see if the AFL change any rules or ban them from trading"
How about the change to how the finals got played in 2012 *no impact on outcome
How about pick 19 for the number one player in the league when they had the discretionary power to change it and didn't
Facts are, every team at some point gets shafted by the AFL but yes, this ban sucks and I don't see why your club hasn't taken it further