This is where 6 for our future first comes into it although they don't get their other player until next year.While there is a degree of equity in your suggested trades, surely there is no way GWS does a fanciful trade unless they have the opportunity to
land Green plus another player.
However there are complications for the back end of this draft albeit workable.
6 for 9 could be good for us if GWS don't have a better option.
Only 300 points diff so can probably square it off this year.
This would then keep open the option with Hawks of 11 & 30 for our future first if they had to match an earlier bid.