I watched that and I think Leigh was correct overall really. I don't think he was justifying the umpire's decisions, he was more rebuking the AFL for their reaction to it.Lethal was on AFL360 last night trying to justify the umpiring decisions. He’s in the tiny minority. No conflict of interest at all.![]()
Things he said:
- It was technically a free kick, push in the back. I agree with that. Technically.
- He said it was contentious - he didn't harp on about that but he agreed it was.
The key thing is, this was a judgement call and whilst the umpire's judgement was an outlier to just about everyone else, it was his call and he made it. Having the AFL come out and tick off or repudiate every contentious decision would be a tiresome and pointless exercise. I mean, OK so the first one "wasn't a free" according to the AFL. Cool. What do we do with that.
He then went on to say the AFL threw the umpire under the bus by saying it shouldn't have been paid. I do agree with him generally about this - the AFL should be standing by their umpires a lot more and not reacting to every media request for 'does the AFL sanction this or that decision?'
So he has a point there. AFL should only comment more broadly on umpiring where there are systemic problems with it or systemic misunderstanding of the rules on the part of players, coaches and fans.
On this 'judgement call' though: In the back has been almost a non-rule though for a while so he (Leigh) could have expanded upon that a bit.




