Daniel Menzel vs Stewart Crameri

[Jade]

Do a poll for Daniher v Kosi see who wins.

How do I word the poll?

Since my player is the unproven kid, surely I have to word in such a way that 'potential' is the key figure to look at yes?

I'm sure you'll agree with me that no matter who gets the votes, Kosi or Daniher, we all inevitably lose in the 'my junk is bigger than your junk' shitfight sure to follow......

 

[The Finger]

How do I word the poll?

Since my player is the unproven kid, surely I have to word in such a way that 'potential' is the key figure to look at yes?

I'm sure you'll agree with me that no matter who gets the votes, Kosi or Daniher, we all inevitably lose in the 'my junk is bigger than your junk' shitfight sure to follow......

Point is people can see Menzel will be better than Crameri same as Daniher shows signs he will be better than Kosi.

 

[Jade]

Where Essendon supporters ignore the second year player and first round talent who kicked five against the Pies and two in a qualifying final against the Saints.

As opposed to the second year player who kicked four against the Pies?

Who is the player you are referring to BTW - couldn't find one that met the criteria you set down.

*EDIT* I'm going to assume you meant Menzel - the game was against the HAwks; not Saints IIRC.

 

[Jade]

Point is people can see Menzel will be better than Crameri same as Daniher shows signs he will be better than Kosi.

People can't see shit, let's face it.

BigFooty has a horrible record with predicting the future. And I'll happily raise my own hand as guilty as charged on that one.

Point being, these polls are a complete exercise in flogging. Nobody knows anything when it comes to future events.

You can guess, you can offer an opinion, you can even offer some valid and insightful reasons why.

In the specific case here, you have a young kid with ability against a not quite so young kid with performance.

Replace Menzel with Gumbleton, Crameri with Gunston and repeat the exercise.

You'll get the same ridiculous remarks regarding potential and what would have been, or what people can 'see'.....

The only thing that changes is the usernames of the bright sparks trying to bang their chest and pass off their own hopes as 'fact'.

 

[footscore]

Start a poll, your club has the ability to chose from Gunston or Crameri for nothing which one do you chose?

are you for real?
Gunston is a twig and will always be a Brad Green type of player while Crameri is a Jack Darling-type and capable of getting much stronger and impacting games as basically a 2nd key forward.

Your ability to twist a subject around to make it about your "wonderful Hawthorn" is quite bewildering as anyone who watches footy and knows a little about the game would clearly choose Crameri over Gunston.
Gunston only had a decent season due to the abundance of forward power handed to him at Hawthorn while Crameri had to contend with an injury depleted line-up at Essendon as well as succumbing to injuries himself throughout the year.

 

[Lance Uppercut]

Menzel for me, Crameri flat tracks it a fair bit, he kicked 23 goals in the first 9 games while the bombers were flying and then 9 in the last nine games when it got tougher...

you mean when the ball stopped coming down in an advantageous manner, or at all?

What a shock.