GO DONS
Debutant
okay lets cut the crap at there peak who wins?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Sampras.
We have no idea how Federer would have gone against guys like Boris Becker, Andre Agassi, Ivan Lendl, John McEnroe, Jim Courier or any of the other great players that were around in Sampras' time.
However, Sampras beat them ALL.
Huh,
John McEnroe, Ivan Lendl had retired by the time Sampras was no1.
Becker was almost finished also.
Can't compare them, when they didn't play the same era.
exactly right, he is superb and has some of the best skills ever, he can pretty much do as he pleases.On ability alone Federer. Watching his destruction of Roddick was, well, Quantum Tennis 101, the masters degree textbook of Tennis. I've been lucky enough to witness both at their peaks and the way Fed plays, his shot selection and the sheer control he plays them with is nothing short of sublime
Sampras.
We have no idea how Federer would have gone against guys like Boris Becker, Andre Agassi, Ivan Lendl, John McEnroe, Jim Courier or any of the other great players that were around in Sampras' time.
However, Sampras beat them ALL.
The fact of the matter is, Roddick and Nadal are no match for the competition that Sampras faced, and while they're still young, Federer's current winning percentage only matches the one that Sampras retired with.
Federer still has to improve his winning percentage and break Sampras' record by a fair bit before I'll consider him better, because he's doing it against lesser competition.
Yes, and most tennis observers would rate rod laver and borg above sampras in ability and what they could have achieved.Federer easily I'd say. Even Rod Laver said he is completely amazed by his ability. He said "It's unfair for one player to be so good at everything" or something along thsoe lines. Quite a complement coming form one of the greatest tennis players of all time.
don't like either
Dont bother posting then

How do you figure that they had retired when he played and beat them all?Huh,
John McEnroe, Ivan Lendl had retired by the time Sampras was no1.
Becker was almost finished also.
Can't compare them, when they didn't play the same era.
Most people don't even regar him as the best ever.How do you figure that they had retired when he played and beat them all?
Go ahead and look it up - He really did beat them in Grand Slam play.