- Moderator
- #151
Tommy The Scholar.
Absolutely brilliant speech. Thanks for posting it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tommy The Scholar.
I don't care about his background, he's a racist hypocrite, very keen that others live up to standards that he himself is unable to follow, I fail to see why the hell you'd possibly defend someone like that. In other circumstances you couldn't get Roget out quick enough to find words to denounce someone like him.
I don't care about his background, he's a racist hypocrite, very keen that others live up to standards that he himself is unable to follow, I fail to see why the hell you'd possibly defend someone like that. In other circumstances you couldn't get Roget out quick enough to find words to denounce someone like him.
Let's face it, the entire philosophy of the Brit revolves around capitulation, and that is why they've lost their whole island to Islam.
If you look at their 18-25 demographic, the most popular name over there now with young people is Muhammed...or Simon.
They seem to form all their policies around who it will least offend. It has proven not to work, and I fear we have lost England forever.
Interesting to see the part about the elderly getting forced out of enclaves. I'd heard about this but had never seen the evidence.Absolutely brilliant speech. Thanks for posting it.
A white racist who defends blacks, gays and Jews from Muslim gangs. He must be stopped!I don't care about his background, he's a racist hypocrite, very keen that others live up to standards that he himself is unable to follow, I fail to see why the hell you'd possibly defend someone like that. In other circumstances you couldn't get Roget out quick enough to find words to denounce someone like him.
More than prepared to assist with this project. Fond of women who wear head scarves I am.4.4% of the total population - they'd want to start pumping them out to get the numbers
Halfway through it now, probably wouldn't have watched it if you hadn't also suggested it.I strongly suggest watching that last video mate, it is actually pretty good.
I agree, a lot of em who are crticising are proposing extreme measures like banning them from entering our country, deporting them drowning them in pigs blood, throwing them off the plane in Raqqa, calling them incestuous pedophiles etc etc.In fairness, trying to mod these terrorist attack threads must be a nightmare.
I think a lot of legitimate criticism is being dismissed as coming from a place of bigotry but I can sympathise with any mod who tries to keep these shitshows on the rails.
How is it terrorism? Which groups have taken responsibly? Exactly, none. An isolated event in the overall scheme of things.If you want to be critical of Islam take it to a different thread.
This is the third time I have had to say this, and someone has already got a day off for not listening to the last two warnings.
We get it; Salafissm and Wahhabism are bad. We have a thread for that.
This is a thread discussing a despicable at of terrorism against Muslims. Not a thread for Right wing loons to continue that same terrorism by demonising them generally.
Terrorism isn't reliant on a group taking credit.How is it terrorism? Which groups have taken responsibly? Exactly, none. An isolated event in the overall scheme of things happening in Europe (rape, violence, theft, killings)
So any act of violence carried out is terrorism?Terrorism isn't reliant on a group taking credit.
If a radical Muslim with no concrete ties to any extremist group commits atrocities, would you call that terrorism?So any act of violence carried out is terrorism?
This isnt the thread to hang s**t on Islam. I wont say it again.
Ordinary Muslims were the victims of this attack. Some of them even intervened to protect the very man that had just rammed a van into a bunch of people.
Even the head (and founder) of the EDL above clearly states that the issue is with (the Salaffi/ Wahhabi) branches of the religion who adhere to a 7th century interpretation of the religon, and not with ordinary Muslims (the majority).
Its akin to a thread on the Manchester attack focussing on why the 14 year old girls at the concert were s**t.
Be better than that.
Saying that it was "ordinary" Muslims who were attacked is a bit narrow sighted.
Let me say first, a terror attack is a terror attack, and the sector of the religion that was attacked does not change what the act was. The particular mosque that was attacked has reportedly been the centre of British Investigations, with numerous Arrests for extremism.
It was a targeted attack - that is the definition of terrorism, and I do not dispute that
Which of the victims were abnormal Muslims?Saying that it was "ordinary" Muslims who were attacked is a bit narrow sighted.
Let me say first, a terror attack is a terror attack, and the sector of the religion that was attacked does not change what the act was. The particular mosque that was attacked has reportedly been the centre of British Investigations, with numerous Arrests for extremism.
It was a targeted attack - that is the definition of terrorism, and I do not dispute that
Which of the victims were abnormal Muslims?
You don't need a 'group' for it to be terrorism. Timothy McVeigh was a terrorist and he didn't belong to any group.How is it terrorism? Which groups have taken responsibly? Exactly, none. An isolated event in the overall scheme of things happening in Europe (rape, violence, theft, killings)
Saying that it was "ordinary" Muslims who were attacked is a bit narrow sighted.
It's a pity there's not the same examination of why a young Muslim may be driven to extremism as there is on why this guy did what he did.