Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour GFC 2023 Player Trading, Drafting FA, Rumours and Wish lists Pt II

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

We talk about Frampton how opposition fans talk about Kolo

Kolo has his limitations but hes still a regular in a top 4 side.

Not a fringe player who barely has 50 games in 8 years and then has 2 possessions in a GF.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

As suggested above, but it is a big IF at present.
I hope Danger's finals media commitments have made him even hungrier for another tilt.
I hope the players watched this and kick themselves because this year might have been one of the best chances we would have had for back to back, and the Pies will be thinking that next year. Dees were meant to be a dynasty and tapered off, the other big teams like Port and Brisbane have horrendous MCG records.

There is no obvious "dynasty" team and next years flag will be as wide open as this years.
 
Collingwood had the 4th oldest list this year. Not exactly young

Yeah but the numbers are misleading because their data is skewed by cox being 31 as is elliot, plus whe and sidebottom and pendlebury and howe.

As good as a lot of those players are only howe really plays in a key position for them at this point the rest are role players.

Whereas danger hawkins cameron stanley guthrie blicavs and duncan all play key critical positions for us and are over 30.

Coll also have better quality players in that crucial 25-28yo age bracket like de goey moore maynard josh daicos noble (i know he missed but he was crucial this year) mcstay cameron plus mitchell and adams pushing 30. Cameron is bog average but the rest are very good to elite. Whereas our players in the same age bracket really are only moc atkins kolo bews bowes sav jack henry and zuthrie. Apart from henry and atkins we dont have the same quality in the middle age bracket.
 
Holmes and Caleb Windsor, great wingers for the now and the next 8-10 years.

Small point, but Pies are NOT the challengers.
I do wonder if they can keep up the intensity a third year .
The evergreen Pendles and Sidebottom were crucial for them yesterday, and are going around again.
The heat did not deter their output, and their fitness as a team is way superior to all other teams.
This is an area we can not compete in, and will keep us from being legitimate contenders, UNLESS we can rectify this with our lengthy off season.
Our captain is said to do the BARE MINIMUM at training, and that is not leading by example.
Dubs, you're barely on board when we're winning flags...so I can't say I'm surprised with your thoughts.

However, it feels like you've just reiterated what I've said? Collingwood are the premiers, they've earned favouritism until we see a decent amount of footy in '24.
 
It's amazing Nathan Kreuger still on there list... he be delisted when his contract is up ( footy wire saying next year)

He will get one more year bc of their lack of tall depth but i doubt he makes it.
 
Collingwood finished 7 days before us last year. Doubt there was a massive difference in pre season length.
It's not the length of the pre-season, it's the partying that sets you back.

Hodge spoke about it during the year. It's that extra couple of beers after a training session, at Christmas, stuff like that.

While the Pies were burning and getting straight back into training, our boys were basking in their glory and (rightly) enjoying themselves.

It made for a disappointing season, but we'll be seeing a very different approach this year. Fitness/professionalism had never been an issue for our club prior to this year.
 
Dubs, you're barely on board when we're winning flags...so I can't say I'm surprised with your thoughts.

However, it feels like you've just reiterated what I've said? Collingwood are the premiers, they've earned favouritism until we see a decent amount of footy in '24.
Very on board.
You're spot on with this post.
My point was just that Pies are the premiers, it's up to other teams too challenge them now.
 
Nobody's saying we'll just climb straight back to the top next year because we're Geelong and that's what we do.

I don't believe anyone here is exhibiting that type of hubris, there's tangible reasons.

A proper grueling summer, resulting in a fit side able to run out games, and have bodies prepared for the rigours of week-to-week elite football.

Our major issue being our midfield, with some urgent reinforcement in the form of Guthrie & Clark, with Bailey Smith now a distinct possibility. The likes of Dow, Wines & Thomas feel less likely, but are still possible inclusions.

If not, a Ryley Sanders type is a mature enough body to still contribute day 1 at an AFL club, and with grunt and toughness at the contest, he's exactly what the doctor ordered.

The likes of Henry, Bruhn, Holmes, Neale, Dempsey & SDK will only improve, with Close & Stengle hoping to bounce back from disappointing years (May have partied a bit too much post flag)

A full season from Jack Henry will help, as will another proper pre-season for Jez & Hawk, who were both clearly hampered for large portions of the year.

Bowes will flourish with another year in our system, and hopefully some injury luck. Even the great Gary Junior said himself it took him a year to get his head around how we play.

The ruck while not a strength, will be more than fine if Stanley can stay healthy or the addition of a Flynn type. Some quick development from Conway could do wonders, too.

I'm in no way saying the flags in the bag in 2024...but we're not kidding ourselves here thinking it's possible.

Credit to Brisbane & Collingwood...but the cream of the crop are not that good.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Kolo has his limitations but hes still a regular in a top 4 side.

Not a fringe player who barely has 50 games in 8 years and then has 2 possessions in a GF.
To be fair to Frampton hes always looked miles more competent in defence, he was very good back there earlier in the year, why teams keep trying to turn him into a forward baffles me
 
Nobody's saying we'll just climb straight back to the top next year because we're Geelong and that's what we do.

I don't believe anyone here is exhibiting that type of hubris, there's tangible reasons.

A proper grueling summer, resulting in a fit side able to run out games, and have bodies prepared for the rigours of week-to-week elite football.

Our major issue being our midfield, with some urgent reinforcement in the form of Guthrie & Clark, with Bailey Smith now a distinct possibility. The likes of Dow, Wines & Thomas feel less likely, but are still possible inclusions.

If not, a Ryley Sanders type is a mature enough body to still contribute day 1 at an AFL club, and with grunt and toughness at the contest, he's exactly what the doctor ordered.

The likes of Henry, Bruhn, Holmes, Neale, Dempsey & SDK will only improve, with Close & Stengle hoping to bounce back from disappointing years (May have partied a bit too much post flag)

A full season from Jack Henry will help, as will another proper pre-season for Jez & Hawk, who were both clearly hampered for large portions of the year.

Bowes will flourish with another year in our system, and hopefully some injury luck. Even the great Gary Junior said himself it took him a year to get his head around how we play.

The ruck while not a strength, will be more than fine if Stanley can stay healthy or the addition of a Flynn type. Some quick development from Conway could do wonders, too.

I'm in no way saying the flags in the bag in 2024...but we're not kidding ourselves here thinking it's possible.

Credit to Brisbane & Collingwood...but the cream of the crop are not that good.
If we can bring in one or two decent midfielders I am significantly more confident of a flag next year than I was when we were on a 10 game winning run last year.

But will we, is the question.
 
If we can bring in one or two decent midfielders I am significantly more confident of a flag next year than I was when we were on a 10 game winning run last year.

But will we, is the question.
We'll bring in someone, just depends on who. Too much smoke around too many names.

The club won't stand still, the players and club would be filthy that it looks like we let an opportunity slip through enjoying ourselves too much.

Barrett's and ITK's have been consistent that we'll be after Smith, or someone similar to bolster the midfield weakness. Just whether we can get it done.

If the club rates him high enough, it could be a big play for Sanders, too.

Said it before, but they don't let us down often. The goal to compete every year is still there, and we're going to need a mid (or two) to do it.
 
That is true

But our 22 celebrations definitely impacted our 23 season.

And I am ok with that

Probably shows what a fantatsic era we had...in 07 thru 11 to not have those hang over years. We have had a near decade of getting pipped just short of the ultimate... , add the covid years .. so I agree ..Im fine with gusy having a bit of a let down.


Getting some fresher younger guys into our best side that have not had success, let them start to become the leaders of the new era transition a few of the older players out will see us bounce. Its just a matter when and to what degree.


I hate to see us trade anything of significance for Wines.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Probably shows what a fantatsic era we had...in 07 thru 11 to not have those hang over years. We have had a near decade of getting pipped just short of the ultimate... , add the covid years .. so I agree ..Im fine with gusy having a bit of a let down.


Getting some fresher younger guys into our best side that have not had success, let them start to become the leaders of the new era transition a few of the older players out will see us bounce. Its just a matter when and to what degree.


I hate to see us trade anything of significance for Wines.
Wines + 37 for Esava + F1 would keep both clubs happy I think. If we're picking up Wines, we plan on that F1 finishing in the 15-18 range.
 
We'll bring in someone, just depends on who. Too much smoke around too many names.

The club won't stand still, the players and club would be filthy that it looks like we let an opportunity slip through enjoying ourselves too much.

Barrett's and ITK's have been consistent that we'll be after Smith, or someone similar to bolster the midfield weakness. Just whether we can get it done.

If the club rates him high enough, it could be a big play for Sanders, too.

Said it before, but they don't let us down often. The goal to compete every year is still there, and we're going to need a mid (or two) to do it.

I don’t doubt we’re interested in smith. But I’m not sure if we are willing/able to come up with enough to appease the dogs while he’s contracted for next year.

And I don’t know l if there’s anyone else available that will significantly boost us next year.
 
Wines + 37 for Esava + F1 would keep both clubs happy I think. If we're picking up Wines, we plan on that F1 finishing in the 15-18 range.
Wines is a 29yo next week, just FYI. And if it's a salary dump, that could even be generous from us, but close to ball park.

We won't go for him tbh. We brought in Bruhn, and have Knevitt and Clark in development. We might not even go for Sanders, but probably will if he is best available. Guthrie and Clark next year, and another 4kgs on Knevitt gives us some new options next season already.
 
Last edited:
Why not lower the eyes a little? Rhylee West at the dogs. He does not butcher the ball as much as Bailey Smith and I believe wants more on ball time. Is a guy who looks to give everything when he plays.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top