Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I hate the thought of trading down for a couple of middling picks in the teams. Unless it is a reasonable deal just take our pick to the draftThat's why i want nothing to do with either team.
They're trying to get us to give pick 7 for unders
I hate the thought of trading down for a couple of middling picks in the teams. Unless it is a reasonable deal just take our pick to the draft
That's why i want nothing to do with either team.
They're trying to get us to give pick 7 for unders
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Carlton will offer p16 and a future 1st. Not enough as i expect they finish top next year.
Wce they have nothing of enough value unless they offer a future 1st which i cant see them doing. Theres no deal there unless they trade p1 for a bounty of picks and offer us some of those for 7.
Melb 13 and 25 and 33 or 13 and fr1 (prefer the latter)
Dogs 10 and 17 (if they dont get 4, but we would need to send a later pick back)
Adel 9 and 21 or 9 and fr1 (we would have to send later 2024 picks back so they have points for welsh)
Nm: 14 and 2024 p19 (we might want more)
These are all more realistic deals for 7 and much better for us than carl/wce.
Of course they are - negotiation 101. It's a competitive world.That's why i want nothing to do with either team.
They're trying to get us to give pick 7 for unders
I have mentioned this kid a bit when we talked about drafting a ruck late.... Taylor Goad... for 205cm kid..his has speed. Id like to see how he went in te 2k ...
South Australian ruck steals the show
South Adelaide's Taylor Goad has been building this season, and his size-defying speed has been an eye-catching trait on the field. Two sub-three second 20m sprints confirmed his freakish acceleration at 205cm. Goad's 2.97 seconds placed him in the top 10 for the draft combine amongst a bevy of smalls.
Goad has been a presence for the premiership-winning Panthers all season, and his three big contested marks in the Grand Final against Sturt showcased his improved all-round game. He looms as an exciting tall to develop at the next level.
![]()
2023 AFL Draft Combine: Top times and biggest moments
A bevy of West Australian draft hopefuls have blitzed the AFL Draft Combine, while the top of the crop made the first-round picture a little clearer.www.espn.com.au
Has 'Wells' written all over him
If you want to move up pick positions its ALWAYS been a thing that you have to pay up.Of course they are - negotiation 101. It's a competitive world.
Not much apart the top 3 results .... but what took my attention... is the kid Graham . 2nd in the 20M sprint. 2nd in the standing vertical./ 3rd in the running vertical..... This the 4th kid GC have dibs on. I wond what tehy do if someone went real early on him?
![]()
2023 AFL Draft Combine: Top times and biggest moments
A bevy of West Australian draft hopefuls have blitzed the AFL Draft Combine, while the top of the crop made the first-round picture a little clearer.www.espn.com.au
Top National Draft Combine Results
20m sprint
1st: Aiden O'Driscoll - 2.871 seconds
2nd: Will Graham - 2.915
3rd: Caleb Windsor - 2.916
Agility test
1st: Lance Collard - 8.157 seconds
2nd: Koltyn Tholstrup - 8.194
3rd: Angus Hastie - 8.204
2km time trial
1st: Tarkyn O'Leary - 5:48 minutes
2nd: Darcy Wilson - 5:52
3rd: Ethan Read - 5:56
Standing vertical jump
1st: Zane Zakostelsky - 80cm
2nd: Will Graham, Phoenix Gothard and Mitchell Edwards - 78cm
Running vertical jump
1st: Darcy Wilson - 98cm
2nd: Zane Duursma - 97cm
3rd: Will Graham and Kane McAuliffe - 95cm
What could they possibly offer?You don't know that.
Problem with that approach is that we have 5 list spots to fill. We could promote Dempsey and possible Mullin from rookie list which would mean we only needed to fill 3 spots but all 3 picks would be at 80 odd and we have to keep those players on the list for 2 years. If we trade for multiple picks needs to be 2 second rounders in this year's draft. I would rather keep pick 7 and increase our chances of getting a decent player. Take our chnace's on the late picks.
Carlton confirmed their interest in our pick 7 on trade radio just then if that means anything
Have said all along I think 9 and 21/24 is most likely. There's always a draft 'bolter', and I think O'Sullivan could fall to our pick - and the Crows will pick up the phone as a result.
Reckon we'd be happy with Wilson if we knew the team in between us wouldn't pick him. Pretty confident though that we won't trade the pick before draft night, as there's a chance someone we want could slide.
Also think there's a fair chance we could use our F1 or F2 to get into this draft, if someone we want is still on the board at GWS' pick, for example.
Be interesting to see how it all plays out. The next 10 days is going to very boring for Geelong supporters, me thinks.
Carlton confirmed their interest in our pick 7 on trade radio just then if that means anything
I'm no expert, but wouldn't the vast majority of these trades be for higher money?Road trips are the best times for random thoughts - reading the above tweet about Brisbane lodging paperwork for Doedee and Adelaide now being in a position to match & force a trade had me thinking about free agency and especially UFA
As per the current rules, when the new team lodges paperwork for an UFA, the current team has 3 days to match the offer - the player can then either sign with their current team (not going to happen), a trade is forced between the 2 teams or the player enters the draft
Should the rules around UFA be tweaked somewhat, and that before the current team has their 3 days to match, the AFL (or AFL House /whoever) does a review of the most recent offer from the current team, compared with the offer made by the new team
IF the most recent offer from the current team is lower than that made by the new team, they lose the right to match - the premise being, you didn't value the player at that level when making your offer, so why now should you view them at that value just as a means of making things difficult...
This would stop teams being able to force a trade if they don't like the potential compensation on offer, while also placing an expectation on them to be fair with their own offer to the player & not undervalue them to see what happens