Better Loosen Up
Brownlow Medallist
Box Hill - Heidelberg, Burwood or Glen Waverley you might do a lot though.
I would think Glen Waverley to Box Hill would be very popular.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Box Hill - Heidelberg, Burwood or Glen Waverley you might do a lot though.
6.5 years away and the article suggested it’s about hitting targets for 2030. Shouldn’t we have an idea of where we are heading?
What realistically makes you think we'll scale back flights or make them drastically more expensive?
People aren't simply going to stop wanting to travel, airlines won't stop running services they can fill.
Does the government have the power to reduce/scrap flights to reduce emissions?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
For a moment, let's give the Premier the benefit of the doubt on the Suburban Rail Loop, another projects where the modelled economic benefits don't look that good right now. It's a classic "build it and they will come" project. It's not a catch up project, it's a visionary one. We've essentially had one transport infrastructure project like this in Victorian history: The Eastern Freeway, a road which took decades to fill capacity.
At worst, as far as cost/benefit and need is concerned, it commits all the same sins as the East-West Link. It's not needed now, and may not be for some time.
But the Premier ain't selling it like that. He says we need it now, and the priority of the loop is Cheltenham to Box Hill, which is ridiculous. The priority should be in the West if anything, but that ain't where the swinging voters are.
Why would they want to? They donated $2b to Qantas, pollies love their overseas junkets, and pissing off every voter wealthy enough to travel overseas isn't a vote winner.
I think it’s a pretty valid question. It looks as if it’s something being considered to reduce emissions. Shouldn’t we wait until we know for sure before building the airport rail link?
Does the West Gate Bridge & Freeway pre date the eastern Freeway (academic question fwiw).
Bizarre/tenuous ???
So.
Good, it'll be released which is a win for public disclosure, but it'll have zero impact with the electorate, no matter how the Murdoch set try to make bizarre and tenuous connections to Dan.
So nothing should get built because something hypothetical might happen in ten years?
Do you think transport infrastructure might benefit citizens for a lot longer than the games?
Not running a candidate in the Warrandyte byelection. Surprising
![]()
‘Abandoned their own supporters’: Labor won’t run in Warrandyte byelection, MPs told
The decision gives Opposition Leader John Pesutto a boost to his leadership and his party’s winning odds.www.theage.com.au
Already plenty of bus and train routes that service those areas though
The SRL will be good to have but don't you think now is not the time to start a $125B project of line-ball economic value that will take a decade to complete? If it was half completed it would be a no-brainer, but it is in its infancy. The money promised by the Feds ($2.2B) is negligible when compared with the initial total Stage 1 estimate of $33B (which will undoubtedly be a lot more once tender submissions are received).What the?????
To get a train you have to go to the city and then out again. And the bus network is laughably inefficient.
Just because you personally won't use something, it does not mean it is not worthwhile and that others won't benefit from it. This sort of infrastructure investment is necessary and will become more necessary in the future. Build it now, not later.
As to the need for a C grade sporting event that glorifies imperialism...well Andrews was out of his mind to commit to it in the first place.
We can do both.Good point. I’m not sure what the patronage would be.
Do you think now is the time to build this? Dan doesn’t think an Airport rail link is important at this point of time. Of the 50 busiest airports in the world, of which Melbourne is one, we are one of 2 or 3 without a rail link. Have you tried catching a taxi at the airport lately? The taxi ranks have been shifted out of sight with Uber given precedence. It’s a dog’s breakfast IMO.
1 decent bus. The 903.Already plenty of bus and train routes that service those areas though
The SRL will be good to have but don't you think now is not the time to start a $125B project of line-ball economic value that will take a decade to complete? If it was half completed it would be a no-brainer, but it is in its infancy. The money promised by the Feds ($2.2B) is negligible when compared with the initial total Stage 1 estimate of $33B (which will undoubtedly be a lot more once tender submissions are received).
I simply cannot see how the government can pay for it unless it raises new taxes. The "Value Capture" tax on properties in the corridor is supposed to raise $11B, but experts have said unless family properties are included the government won't net anything close to $11B
Fair enough. I just reckon the Airport Rail Link should be given precedence over a suburban rail link. FMD, Brisbane has had an airport rail link for over a decade. Governments on both sides have dicked around on the Melbourne rail link for decades. Dan has now canned it twice in 9 years. I guess no votes in it.Maybe mate, I am just not as obsessed with what I would call good debt as others are. If we are running up a bill in the name of infrastructure then in most cases the longer term benefits outweigh the costs.
The longer you wait to get these big projects started, the more people get disrupted as you go.
Economies expand when governments spend in the right areas and usually that means building stuff.
Save money in a Liberal held seat, add another religious rightwinger to the party room and not risk a spill against Pesutto.Not running a candidate in the Warrandyte byelection. Surprising
![]()
‘Abandoned their own supporters’: Labor won’t run in Warrandyte byelection, MPs told
The decision gives Opposition Leader John Pesutto a boost to his leadership and his party’s winning odds.www.theage.com.au
lmao, stop wishcasting.Not sure what the internal analysis that led to this decision is.
Of course, one suggestion (I think it is highly unlikely) is Daniel Andrews is quitting before then. Personally I think he will have to be defeated at an election to relinquish the job. But otherwise the risk of running doesn't appear apparent to me.
I would expect Andrews to leave sometime after the Metro Tunnel is opened.Not sure what the internal analysis that led to this decision is.
Of course, one suggestion (I think it is highly unlikely) is Daniel Andrews is quitting before then. Personally I think he will have to be defeated at an election to relinquish the job. But otherwise the risk of running doesn't appear apparent to me.
Correct weightI would expect Andrews to leave sometime after the Metro Tunnel is opened.
And before the West Gate tunnel is openedI would expect Andrews to leave sometime after the Metro Tunnel is opened.