- May 5, 2006
- 62,726
- 70,017
- AFL Club
- West Coast
That's like taking out 1981 of assessment of Botham or 1999 WC from Kluesner.
It's not taking out anything, it's looking at bodies of work.
Players have dominant matches, series, tournaments, seasons, years... Shane Watson stayed in the test team for 5 years off the back scoring a few 50s in a row.
Steve Smith scored 1,000+ @ 72+ for 4 years in a row in tests. Marnus scored 1,100 @ 65 for a year batting alongside Smith. Tim Paine scored 73* in the lat test. It doesn't put them all on the same level.
A team of the decade takes in performances across that decade. Brad Hogg took 13 wickets @ 25 in the 2003 World Cup and 21 wickets @ 16 in 2007. He was excellent, but I doubt anyone is picking him over Murali and his 500 ODI wickets for their team of that decade.
Ben Stokes is great, but we're talking about a guy that averages 38 with the bat and 36 with the ball from 14 Ashes tests. His innings in Leeds phenomenal, but like Flintoff he had his purple patch and outside that was on par with plenty of other guys over a bigger sample size. He's not a Smith who averages 50 or 60 for fun and then starts scoring 200s because no one else can bat. And I don't blame him for it. The unicorn that is your best batsman and your best bowler and can score quickly and can come on and take quick wickets over an extended period doesn't exist. An all rounder at 5/6 should be contributing with bat and ball and playing the odd match winning innings, not carrying the team.
To look at it another way, if you reversed the years 2011-2020 people would probably be stacking their ODI teams with Tillakaratne Dilshan and Yuvraj Singh.