Is Nat Fyfe in trouble for this incident?

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

The checklist gets a lot of ticks...

1. Late hit- wasn't a play on the ball.
2. Left the ground.
3. Made clear contact with the head.

I'm fairly confident that the 'low impact' defence will get used due to Greenwood's ability to play on, but a forearm to the head from a guy sprinting at you is clearly heavy contact.

Should get two weeks, will get a fine.
 
If he wasn't a Brownlow contender he'd definitely be in trouble and most likely get weeks. So to answer the question.... I've got no idea???

More importantly, was Ross the Boss flossing in the box when it happened??!!
 
If he wasn't a Brownlow contender he'd definitely be in trouble and most likely get weeks. So to answer the question.... I've got no idea???

More importantly, was Ross the Boss flossing in the box when it happened??!!
Get weeks please it was a love tap free kick was paid move on
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So how many incidents has Fyfe had the media stick up for him in the last few years? I thought once he got his Brownlow he would be treated like everyone else.
 
The action of jumping and hitting a bloke in the head with a forearm should be a couple of weeks.
The fact that Greenwood wasn't concussed or down for long was just luck but with Fyfe being a Brownlow contender I can see this one being managed into a fine.
Classic case of outcome assesment and looking after the ALF brand.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top