jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
To play the devils advocate, it would be pretty easy for the horse to fabricate that story to defend his actions, being verbal means there's no audit trail, hence no way to prove it either way.
You would think that cancelling a written agreement verbally would be a risky way of doing thing ?
If I owed a mate 10K and we had a written agreement, I wouldn't accept feel comfortable that the debt had been paid until I had a written receipt.
Basically, either the horse is fabricating the verbal change to the agreement, or he's bloody stupid for not getting it in writing.
Regardless of that fact surely the fact there was an illegal agreement there in the first place that needed to be retrospectively terminated is a cause for concern in itself.
Agreed.
Horse was stupid and too trusting.





Worked for Essendon, apparently.


