Nah, the two coaches that come to mind who tried to be controlling "top dogs" in Hardwick and Buckley, both failed at it, and were at death's door infill they realised it just doesn't work in modern football!They've been doing that for years tho.
Kochie has said for a long time that his role was to put the pieces around Ken such that Ken would be a ten year head coach. That's in large part of the problem.
Your head coach should be the top dog, the one everyone looks up and defers to. Based on the resources around Ken and his obvious shortcomings, it's difficult to say that he is the true leader of the club.
They both changed, and the results streak for themselves. Read some of the articles about the great Clarkson. He doesn't even take part in many of Hawthorn's coaching sessions. He entrusts and empowers his assistants, yet he is still the head coach.
Port/Hinkley have failed to get it right in the past few years - no question. However, the changes this year are much more than skin deep. Hinkley himself had made admissions, and subsequent moves, that he has not done before. Let's at least wait until the games start to see how this translates, before we condemn!