Both at their peak, Judd is the better player.
Swan is closer to his peak more often.
This. It's the same reason I'd take Swan over Adam Goodes. Adam Goodes, at his best, is like Judd. That's why he won 2 Brownlows. He wasn't necessarilly the best player week in and week out. He was just
insanely good for about 8 games.
Such a tough one, but I've gotta go with Swan on this one, assuming he maintains this form for years to come, whilst Judd is a proven player. You just have to go on form, and Swan has had it all year. If 2011 returns the same results from these two players, then I'd definitley take Swan.
I find Judd more entertaining though, but Swan is just a blue-collar machine. He gets like 25 kicks a game, 5 handballs. Sexy.