Remove this Banner Ad

Luke Ball Trade Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter flagpie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If this goes through, it is official;

MICK MALTHOUSE HAS LOST HIS MIND.

Seriously, trading a young KPP backman (who are almost impossible to find), who we took at pick 10 in a supposedly strong draft, for a 25 year old who will probably retire by the time he is 28.

We are trading a possible 200 games for a possible 60, WALK OUT OF THE BUILDING NOW COLLINGWOOD.
 
Obviously the Pies have a reason for trading Brown that we don't know about. Whether it be an injury or perhaps Brown not getting on well behind the scenes with the staff or other players, there MUST be a reason they would trade him over Goldsack.

Someone made a good point the other day about the nature of his injuries, that he's done both muscles or bones or what ever it was in one leg. Apparently from a rehap point of view you dont recover properly from it... Geeze we must really want ball...
 
Someone made a good point the other day about the nature of his injuries, that he's done both muscles or bones or what ever it was in one leg. Apparently from a rehap point of view you dont recover properly from it... Geeze we must really want ball...

So why would the Saints take him?

Surely they would have been briefed on his condition?
 
Obviously the Pies have a reason for trading Brown that we don't know about. Whether it be an injury or perhaps Brown not getting on well behind the scenes with the staff or other players, there MUST be a reason they would trade him over Goldsack.

^ This!
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The rumour about nathan brown is crappppppppppp.
Its a bullshit rumour,we will not trade a kp backman for ball.

Its either a second round pick or the deal will fall through.

I heard that Fraser is being shopped around
Could even be fraser for Ball. not nathan brown.
 
I think it is time to walk away. Offer pick 30 and if he goes in the PSD he goes in the PSD. I don't want to lose Davis or Brown for Ball.
 
brown for ball is disgraceful.. anything less than a first rounder with brown thrown in is not acceptable... no matter which way we paint it... shocking decision and now we have to rely on that hack leroy brown.. cover one deficiency and overlook the fact that we are very light on in GOOD KPPs.. we could have got fev for brown - fev..
 
So why would the Saints take him?

Surely they would have been briefed on his condition?

Beats me, my point is that of Dundalis', if NB goes, there's something we're not seeing here. Injury is the obvious one... but so is our squishy midfield.

I don't know it's all piss and wind until 2pm
 
For those that wanted two big names this trade period

I hope you are all ****en happy, because this is us getting r*ped and left with a gapping hole

If this deal happens collingwood its a massive **** up and major **** you
 
1139: Trade murmur: Still awaiting the latest on Nathan Brown and pick No.62 heading from Collingwood to St Kilda for Luke Ball. The deal isn't completed but there is strong word coming from Etihad Stadium on that one. We'll watch with interest.

from the fox sports blog
 
For those that wanted two big names this trade period

I hope you are all ****en happy, because this is us getting r*ped and left with a gapping hole

If this deal happens collingwood its a massive **** up and major **** you
This.

Is amazing to think we're going to potentially take away the good work of the Jolly trade.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Obviously the Pies have a reason for trading Brown that we don't know about. Whether it be an injury or perhaps Brown not getting on well behind the scenes with the staff or other players, there MUST be a reason they would trade him over Goldsack.

If that is true surely we would have shopped him around for the week and managed something better then Luke Ball, Or at the very least surely we should be getting the sweetner.
 
This will be great when Ball succombs to OP in about 6-12 months, and we have to watch Nathan Brown running about for the next bloody 6-12 years!!
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

St Kilda: "We want Goldsack"
Us: "Nah, that's too high a price, we're not prepared to lose such a valuable defender"
St Kilda: "What about Nathan Brown then?"
Us: "And pick 62 as well? Deal"

Sounds fishy. But ya never know, we've been dumb before.
 
This will be great when Ball succombs to OP in about 6-12 months, and we have to watch Nathan Brown running about for the next bloody 6-12 years!!

Not to mention if Presti breaks down halfway through the next season. Nothing else has come of this since the AFL chat reported it, so it's looking more and more like it's false.
 
A lot of talk on here that Nathan Brown (Coll) will become a Saint for Luke Ball. But I haven't heard even a whisper from anyone here

I like that... It could just be all steam started from an idiot who posted on a blog.
Lets hope so.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom